Abstract

Objective To investigate diagnosis value of abnormal distribution of electrophysiological parameters in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Methods 40 cases of Guillain-Barre syndrome were chosen as an object of study, all patients electrophysiological examination. Record limbs on both sides, upper and lower extremities and proximal and distal motor nerve distal latency ( DML), motor conduction velocity ( MCV ), compound muscle action potential (CMAP) and sensory conduction velocity(SCV) were recorded. Results F wave latency mildly abnormal, moderately abnormal and severe abnormalities were 18.3 % ,6.2 % and 5.3 %, totaling 29.8 %, F-wave occurrence rate mildly abnormal,moderately abnormal and severe abnormalities were 9.3 % 9.8% and 15.6% ,totaling 66.9%. Abnormal sensory conduction velocity was 57.5% ,motor conduction velocity anomaly was 75.7%, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups (x^2 = 5.34, P 〈 0. 05 ). bilateral tibial nerve tests showed mild, moderate and severe in patients with H-reflex abnormality rates were 78.0% ,80.9% and 100.0% ,among the three comparison ( Uc = 1.47 ,P 〉 0.05 ). 3 proximal and distal motor nerve severe damage rates were 48.3 percent and 74.5 percent, the difference was statistically Significant ( x^2= 9.86, P 〈 0. 05 ). Severe upper limb proximal nerve damage was 51.4%, significantly lower than 71.6% of the distal upper extremity, lower extremity proximal nerve severe damage to 44.2 % , significantly lower than the 81.6% of distal lower extremity between them were statistical difference (x^2 = 8.86,12.43, all P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Electrophysiological parameters detection Guillain-Barre syndrome has a high value, which can be accurate response in patients with neurological damage. Key words: Guillain-Barre syndrome ; Nerve conduction; Physiology; Nerve

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call