Abstract

Purpose: We present our experience in the diagnosis, follow-up and planning therapy of thoracic, abdominal and retroperitoneal liquid collections in different emergency patients using conventional and interventional ultrasound. Material and Methods: The right and left oblique and poly positionning view was used in 235 patients (159 male and 76 female) for US examination to identify fluids in the thorax and peritoneal or retroperitoneal space. The examination was performed after the clinical survey with patients supine. Positive findings of US were compared with those provided by CT, punctures under US control or surgery. US machine supplied with linear and convex transducers, CT machine, needles and catheters were used. Results: 197 of all 235 US examined patients had fluid collections, confirmed by CT scan, surgery or clinival course. In 156 patients we performed FN diagnostic punctures under US control. There was 155 true-positives, 25 true-negatives, 5 false-positives and 2 false-negative results. Overall this demonstrated that ultrasonography hamaunt of d a sensitivity of 98.72%, specificity of 83.33% and accuracy of 96.25%. The PPV is 96.87% and the NPV – 92.59%. Conclusions: Our experience and literature reports support the opinion that US examination can and should be used as a primary method for diagnosis and follow-up of clinically suspected free and organaised fluids in the thorax, abdomen and retroperitoneum.

Highlights

  • The thoracic and abdominal traumas remains a challenge for the emargency team

  • One hundred and ninety-seven (83.82%) of all 235 patients examined ultrasonographically had fluid collection, which was verified by computed tomography (CT) scan, tube laparoscopy or after surgery

  • The PPV is 96.87% and the NPV – 92.59%. These results demonstrated that ultrasonography can be used as a sensitive, specific and accurate diagnostic tool for detecting thoracic, abdominal and retroperitoneal liquid collections in clinically suspected patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The thoracic and abdominal traumas remains a challenge for the emargency team. Both false-positive and falsenegative findings bear the risk of severe complications. Clinical evaluation allows the detection of external hemorrhage on antero-posterior chest x-ray and tube thoracostomy. They are sufficient to rule out significant hemothorax [1, 2]. The use of ultrasonography for suficient identification of free and localized thoracic, intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal collections in patients with blunt and penetrating trauma has been well established over the past 25 years [6,7,8,9,10]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call