Abstract

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) affects 1.9 % of couples. Despite the severe physical, psychological, and economic impact of RPL, miscarriage care provision remains highly heterogeneous. Due to the absence of strong scientific evidence, national and international guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of this condition remain unclear and often contradictory. In the absence of identifiable RPL-associated risk factors, when the condition is termed “idiopathic”, immunological tests and immunomodulatory treatments are sometimes suggested even though the contribution of aberrant immune activity to this condition remains undetermined. Through an online survey, distributed across the UK (37.7% response rate), a high variation in clinical practice was detected, with multiple RPL definitions utilized and different tests employed for potential risk factor identification. Immunological testing was found to be provided in 7.9 %(N = 3) of the included clinics. Moreover, multiple therapies, including immunomodulatory ones were utilized for the management of idiopathic RPL. These findings highlight a need for additional research on the implication of immune activity in this condition. The high variation between clinics regarding the tests employed for the diagnosis and management of idiopathic RPL also underlines the need for guidelines to direct clinical practice, taking into consideration both the patients’ needs but also the strength of the available scientific evidence.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call