Abstract

The filarial parasite Dirofilaria immitis causes dirofilariosis, a potentially fatal pulmonary condition in canids and felines. Dirofilariosis can be prevented by treatment with a prophylactic macrocyclic lactone (ML) regimen. Unfortunately, ML-resistant D. immitis isolates, genetically distinct from the wildtype population, have been confirmed via molecular markers. DNA-based tests for ML-resistance are costly and time-consuming. There lacks a simple and reliable in vitro biological test to differentiate D. immitis infections resulting from inadequate adherence to recommended prophylaxis regimens from those caused by truly resistant D. immitis isolates. The goal of the current study was to develop a minimally invasive rapid diagnostic in vitro biological assay to differentiate ML-susceptible from ML-resistant D. immitis isolates. The in vitro assay was developed based on the concept that MLs act on the microfilariae (mf) by paralyzing the excretory pore muscle, inhibiting the release of molecules, including enzymes, that regulate host immunity. The basis of the in vitro diagnostic assay is to assess the effects of ivermectin (IVM) exposure on the secretion of enzymes by the D. immitis mf at a concentration that distinguishes the ML-susceptible from ML-resistant isolates. The metabolic enzyme, triosephosphate isomerase (TPI), was chosen due to high abundance in the D. immitis secretome. In this study, the in vitro TPI enzymatic assay was optimized and tested in eight laboratory-maintained isolates. The ML-susceptible Missouri, Berkeley, and Georgia II isolate; the putative ML-susceptible Georgia III, and Big Head; and the ML-resistant JYD-34, Metairie, and WildCat. We observed mixed results, Missouri and Berkeley had statistically significant decreases in TPI activity following 24-hour in vitro IVM exposure. The three resistant isolates, JYD-34, Metairie, and WildCat showed no change in TPI activity following IVM exposure. The susceptible, or putative susceptible Georgia II, Georgia III, and Big Head isolates had a phenotypic response consistent with ML-resistance based on the in vitro assay. However, increasing genotypic evidence has presented a mixed genotype for the three isolates, indicating they may be partially selected for ML-resistance. The measurement of changes in enzymatic activity and the in vitro TPI enzymatic activity assay consequently does not appear to be a reliable detection method for ML-resistance but may be useful for identifying fully susceptible isolates.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call