Abstract

Supervised machine learning and its algorithms are a developing trend in the prediction of rockfill material (RFM) mechanical properties. This study investigates supervised learning algorithms—support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) for the prediction of the RFM shear strength. A total of 165 RFM case studies with 13 key material properties for rockfill characterization have been applied to construct and validate the models. The performance of the SVM, RF, AdaBoost, and KNN models are assessed using statistical parameters, including the coefficient of determination (R2), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient, root mean square error (RMSE), and ratio of the RMSE to the standard deviation of measured data (RSR). The applications for the abovementioned models for predicting the shear strength of RFM are compared and discussed. The analysis of the R2 together with NSE, RMSE, and RSR for the RFM shear strength data set demonstrates that the SVM achieved a better prediction performance with (R2 = 0.9655, NSE = 0.9639, RMSE = 0.1135, and RSR = 0.1899) succeeded by the RF model with (R2 = 0.9545, NSE = 0.9542, RMSE = 0.1279, and RSR = 0.2140), the AdaBoost model with (R2 = 0.9390, NSE = 0.9388, RMSE = 0.1478, and RSR = 0.2474), and the KNN with (R2 = 0.6233, NSE = 0.6180, RMSE = 0.3693, and RSR = 0.6181). Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis result shows that normal stress was the key parameter affecting the shear strength of RFM.

Highlights

  • The main intention of the present study is to explore the capability of using support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), AdaBoost, and k-nearest neighbor (KNN) algorithms to establish a more precise and parsimonious behavioral model for predicting the rockfill material (RFM) shear strength

  • SVM, of 19 RF, AdaBoost, and KNN models are sensitive to the fitness of the data set

  • The SVM, RF, and AdaBoost algorithms work with a limited data set, i.e., root mean square error (RMSE) = 0.0975, and MAE = 0.0644) and artificial neural network (ANN) method

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rockfill materials (RFMs) are commonly used in civil engineering projects such as rockfill dams, slopes, and embankments as construction materials for filling. This material is either obtained from a river’s alluvial deposits or by blasting available rock [1,2]. The behavior of RFMs used in rockfill dams is important for the safe and cost-effective construction of these structures. Rockfill behaves like a Mohr/Coulomb material, albeit without cohesion and with relatively high internal friction angles. Loosely layered, can behave like coarse sand. The shear strength of both types of RFM is affected by many factors such as mineral composition, surface structure, particle size, shape, relative density, individual particle strength, etc. The shear strength of both types of RFM is affected by many factors such as mineral composition, surface structure, particle size, shape, relative density, individual particle strength, etc. [3,4,5]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call