Abstract

Two new concrete bridge superstructure systems for short and medium span bridges are presented. The investigated systems consist of adjacent hollow precast concrete beams with and without concrete topping. The proposed configurations are compared with traditional adjacent box beam and decked bulb tee systems for spans that range from 24.4m to 45.7m. It is demonstrated that the proposed system that features concrete topping (PS2) is lighter than the adjacent box beam system, requires fewer strands, provides shallower superstructure depths, and exhibits lower cambers for spans equal to 24.4m and 30.5m. PS2 addresses the reflective cracking problems manifested in adjacent box beam systems by shifting the location of the longitudinal connections to the bottom flange and away from traffic loads. The system that features no topping (PS4) is slightly heavier than the decked bulb tee system, but features shallower superstructure depths, requires fewer strands, and exhibits lower live load deflections and camber. Transverse bending moments demand in PS4 are reduced compared to the decked bulb tee system due to the smaller span provided by the two web supports. Live load distribution factors (LLDF) for PS2 and PS4 can be conservatively estimated using AASHTO provisions for adjacent box and decked bulb tee systems, respectively.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.