Development of a qPCR assay for the quantification of canine autosomal DNA recovered from livestock attacks

Abstract

The absence of a standardised method to quantify canine DNA recovered from livestock attacks leaves forensic providers without an important quality control step to help support their decision making. Typically used to normalise the amount of DNA for STR amplification, modern forensic DNA quantification approaches use qPCR of target genes and can also include an Internal Positive Controls (IPC) to determine the presence of PCR inhibitors. The co-amplification of livestock DNA alongside canine DNA has meant that previously developed qPCR methods are not suitable for use so a standardised approach is needed. This research describes the development of a Taq-man multiplex qPCR assay that simultaneously quantifies the autosomal MC1R and Y-specific SRY gene to determine the concentration of canine DNA recovered from attacked livestock. Data suggests that the method is robust and reproducible with no significant difference in the standard curves produced from multiple runs or from different DNA standards derived from different canines. Assay sensitivity of between 15 and 31 pg is consistent with other forensic quantification assays and also in line with the sensitivity of the two tested canine STR kits, Canine Genotype 2.1 Kit and CaDNAP Panels 1 and 2. The assay is highly specific to canines when tested against 163 different dogs representing 33 different breeds and no cross-amplification of non-target species’ DNA was observed even from livestock DNA tested at 31.25ng/µl. This strongly suggests that any DNA detected on evidence collected from attacked livestock is canine. The assay also shows robust tolerance to common livestock inhibitors continuing to amplify when inhibitor-spiked DNA samples were tested. Both mixed and inhibited DNA samples underwent STR typing using two canine forensic STR kits with data showing the Canine Genotype 2.1 Kit displaying pronounced cross-amplification of livestock DNA and and/or extensive PCR inhibition leading to the complete loss of amplification when using this kit. Conversely the CaDNAP Panels 1 and 2 showed little cross-amplification of livestock DNA and improved inhibitor tolerance suggesting that this approach was better suited for the analysis of livestock attack samples. Findings are discussed and the impact of the observations on future work in this area are explored.