Abstract

To date, substrate‐configuration metal‐halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) fabricated on opaque substrates such as metal foils provide inferior efficiencies compared with superstrate‐configuration cells on transparent substrates such as glass. Herein, a substrate‐configuration PSC on planarized steel is presented. To quantify the differences between the two configurations, a 15.6%‐efficient n–i–p superstrate‐configuration PSC is transformed step wise into a substrate‐configuration cell. Guided by optical modeling, the opaque Au electrode is replaced by a transparent MoO3/thin Au/polystyrene dielectric–metal–dielectric electrode. The semitransparent device affords efficiencies of 15.4% and 11.4% for bottom and top illumination, respectively. Subsequently, substrate‐configuration PSCs with a metal bottom electrode are fabricated on glass and planarized steel, using a thin MoO3 interlayer between the Au bottom electrode and the SnO2 electron transport layer. The glass‐based substrate‐configuration cell provides 14.0% efficiency with identical open‐circuit voltage and fill factor as the superstrate cell. The cell on planarized steel reaches 11.5% efficiency due to a lower fill factor. For both substrate‐configuration cells, the lower short‐circuit current density limits the efficiency. Optical modeling explains this quantitatively to be due to absorption and reflection by the top electrode and absorption by the organic hole transport layer.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.