Development and validation of a simulation-based assessment of operative competence for higher specialist trainees in general surgery

Abstract

BackgroundSimulation is increasingly being explored as an assessment modality. This study sought to develop and collate validity evidence for a novel simulation-based assessment of operative competence. We describe the approach to assessment design, development, pilot testing, and validity investigation.MethodsEight procedural stations were generated using both virtual reality and bio-hybrid models. Content was identified from a previously conducted Delphi consensus study of trainers. Trainee performance was scored using an equally weighted Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) tool and a modified Procedure-Based Assessment (PBA) tool. Validity evidence was analyzed in accordance with Messick’s validity framework. Both ‘junior’ (ST2–ST4) and ‘senior’ trainees (ST 5–ST8) were included to allow for comparative analysis.ResultsThirteen trainees were assessed by ten assessors across eight stations. Inter-station reliability was high (α = 0.81), and inter-rater reliability was acceptable (inter-class correlation coefficient 0.77). A significant difference in mean station score was observed between junior and senior trainees (44.82 vs 58.18, p = .004), while overall mean scores were moderately correlated with increasing training year (rs = .74, p = .004, Kendall’s tau-b .57, p = 0.009). A pass-fail score generated using borderline regression methodology resulted in all ‘senior’ trainees passing and 4/6 of junior trainees failing the assessment.ConclusionThis study reports validity evidence for a novel simulation-based assessment, designed to assess the operative competence of higher specialist trainees in general surgery.Graphical abstract