Abstract
BackgroundScreening for undiagnosed diabetes is not widely undertaken due to the high costs and invasiveness of blood sampling. Simple non-invasive tools to identify high risk individuals can facilitate screening. The main objectives of this study are to develop and validate a risk score for screening undiagnosed diabetes among Sri Lankan adults and to compare its performance with the Cambridge Risk Score (CRS), the Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) and three other Asian risk scores.MethodsData were available from a representative sample of 4276 adults without diagnosed diabetes. In a jack-knife approach two thirds of the sample was used for the development of the risk score and the remainder for the validation. Age, waist circumference, BMI, hypertension, balanitis or vulvitis, family history of diabetes, gestational diabetes, physical activity and osmotic symptoms were significantly associated with undiagnosed diabetes (age most to osmotic symptoms least). Individual scores were generated for these factors using the beta coefficient values obtained in multiple logistic regression. A cut-off value of sum = 31 was determined by ROC curve analysis.ResultsThe area under the ROC curve of the risk score for prevalent diabetes was 0.78 (CI 0.73–0.82). In the sample 36.3 % were above the cut-off of 31. A risk score above 31 gave a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 77.9, 65.6, 9.4 and 98.3 % respectively. For Sri Lankans the AUC for the CRS and IDRS were 0.72 and 0.66 repectively.ConclusionsThis simple non-invasive screening tool can identify 80 % of undiagnosed diabetes by selecting 40 % of Sri Lankan adults for confirmatory blood investigations.
Highlights
Screening for undiagnosed diabetes is not widely undertaken due to the high costs and invasiveness of blood sampling
The aim of this study was to develop and validate a screening tool for undiagnosed diabetes in Sri Lanka based on demographic information
Women had higher mean 2-h plasma glucose and body mass index (BMI) compared to men (p < 0.001)
Summary
Screening for undiagnosed diabetes is not widely undertaken due to the high costs and invasiveness of blood sampling. Diagnosis and optimisation of therapy may improve outcomes in patients with diabetes, as tight control of blood glucose and blood pressure has been shown to reduce the incidence of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetic subjects [10, 11] and control of lipids reduces macrovascular disease and Katulanda et al BMC Endocrine Disorders (2016) 16:42 mortality in people with diabetes [12]. This reduction of risk of microvascular complications, myocardial infarcton and death from any cause persisted in 10 years of post-trial followup [13]. We hypothesise that if sensitive, specific and low cost tools (that are non-invasive) can be developed, large scale community level diabetes screening can be undertaken with a potential for the improvement of outcomes in otherwise undiagnosed people
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have