Abstract

This research investigates the use of glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) bars in bridge decks and ultra-high performance fibre-reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) as filling materials in (i) panelto- panel closure strips between transverse precast full-depth deck panels (FDDPs) supported over girders and (ii) the shear pockets for the panel-to-girder connection. The experimental research program included three phases. Phase I examined pullout strength of straight-end and headed-end GFRP bars embedded into UHPFRC to determine the required closure strip width to develop bar full strength. Phase II included the development and study of closure strip details incorporating UHPFRC as joint-filling materials and GFRP bars projecting into the joint. Three joints of width 200 mm between precast FDDPs were developed, namely: angle-shape joint (Ajoint), C-shape joint (C-shape), and zigzag-shape joint (Z-joint), with 175-mm projecting length of GFRP bars into the joint. Two series of 2500x600x200 mm one-way slabs were cast to investigate the flexural strength of the jointed precast slabs compared to cast-in-place slabs. Two types of concrete were used to fabricate the precast FDDPs, namely: normal concrete (NSC) and high-performance concrete (HPC). Correlation between experimental results and available design equations for moment and shear capacities, as well as CHBDC and AASHTO-LR applied factored design moments, was performed. All specimens failed in either flexural or flexural-shear mode outside the UHPFRC-filled joint. Phase III included testing three pairs of 3700x2500x200 mm laterally-restrained precast FDDPs incorporating the three developed joint details in the transverse direction of the girders. Each pair of specimens was tested under 600x250 mm wheel loading located beside the closure strip, considering (i) constant amplitude fatigue (CAF) loading up to 4 million cycles followed by increasing static loading to-collapse, and (ii) incremental variable amplitude fatigue (VAF) loading to-collapse. The failure mode of the tested slabs was punching shear, with the transverse UHPFRC joint diverting the extension of the punching shear plane to the adjacent precast FDDP segment. Results of fatigue load tests on the three-jointed pairs of slabs showed high fatigue performance. A new prediction model for fatigue life of the GFRP-reinforced, UHPFRC-filled jointed deck slabs was developed.

Highlights

  • Background of ResearchThe concept of the accelerated bridge construction (ABC) and rapid bridge replacement (RBR) introduces the prefabricated bridge elements and systems (PBES)

  • The longitudinal high modulus (HM) glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP)/ultra-high performance fiber reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) interface is highly influenced by the embedment lengthto-nominal bar diameter ratio, when the minimum concrete cover is greater than 2 times the bar diameter

  • For straight high-modulus glass fiber reinforced polymer (HM GFRP) bars embedded into UHPFRC, it is recommended to use minimum development length of 9.5 times the bar diameter or 152 mm, whichever is greater, to ensure bar reaching its tensile strength before anchorage failure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background of ResearchThe concept of the accelerated bridge construction (ABC) and rapid bridge replacement (RBR) introduces the prefabricated bridge elements and systems (PBES). Bridge elements are manufactured in plant, transported, installed on-site with cast-in-place joints using high early strength concrete in order to open the bridge for traffic. Precast FDDPs are connected through panel-to-panel and panel-to-girder joints. The general concepts which lead to the advanced performance characteristics of UHPFRC are well known, the commercial availability of UHPFRC and the development of locally-sources UHPFRC mixes has been limited in North America. Typical UHPFRC composition and material properties are available elsewhere (Graybeal, 2010 and 2006). The concept of using the advanced properties of UHPFRC to significantly modify the design of connections between precast concrete components is not new.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call