Abstract

This study was undertaken to 1. develop an apparatus to rapidly measure coefficient of friction (COF) on soft contact lenses; 2. determine if COFs measured on two daily-disposable lens models before and after wear are consistent with changes in lens surface morphology observed in parallel atomic force microscopy (AFM) images. Methods: A stress rheometer was adapted to measure COF on a soft contact lens by custom fabrication of a rapid-mount sample stage for increased throughput. Five subjects were randomly assigned to wear daily disposable nesofilcon A and delefilcon A contact lenses bilaterally for 4 hours, after which time lenses were removed. Static and kinetic COFs of lenses worn on left eyes was measured, while lenses worn on right eyes were imaged in parallel by AFM in tapping mode. Root mean square (RMS) surface roughness was calculated for all lenses to determine the effect of wear on surface topography. Results: Both static and kinetic COFs measured on unworn delefilcon A silicone hydrogel lenses were greater than on nesofilcon A traditional hydrogel lenses. Static COF on nesofilcon A increased significantly after wear, while kinetic COF trended higher but did not change significantly. Similarly, static COF on delefilcon A also increased significantly after wear, and kinetic COF trended higher but did not change significantly, both remaining greater than on worn nesofilcon A. Parallel AFM analysis demonstrated that nesofilcon A lenses are smoother than are delefilcon A out of the package. Both lenses attracted deposits during wear, but the nesofilcon A surface was less altered by on-eye wear than was the delefilcon A surface. Conclusion: A system to rapidly measure static and kinetic COFs was successfully developed. Static and kinetic COFs measured on delefilcon A were greater than on nesofilcon A lenses. More deposits and greater surface roughness were observed after wear on delefilcon A relative to nesofilcon A. Parallel AFM images of worn and unworn lenses were not predictive of measured COFs, but increased roughness visible by AFM was consistent with observed increases in COF, although not all increases were statistically significant.

Highlights

  • Tribological analytical techniques are useful for characterizing micromechanical interactions between a material and a rubbing surface

  • The objectives of this study were two-fold, first to develop a user-friendly apparatus to rapidly measure coefficient of friction (COF) on soft contact lenses with rapid lens mounting, and second to determine if COF measured on two daily-disposable lens models under standardized test conditions before and after wear are consistent with changes in surface topology as imaged by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

  • Both static and kinetic COF measured on unworn nesofilcon A lenses were lower that than those measured on unworn delefilcon A lenses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Tribological analytical techniques are useful for characterizing micromechanical interactions between a material and a rubbing surface (countersurface). COF is sometimes mistakenly described as a lens material property, but should properly be described as a system property (i.e., dependent upon contact equipment and method, lens polymer, test fluid, rubbing surface, etc.) [1]. Poly (methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) and poly (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) [4], glass [1, 5], mucin-coated glass [6], and epithelium [7] are among the rub surfaces reported. Such exotic rub surfaces add even more complexity to the measurement. More exotic surfaces and test fluids may be more indicative of the physiological system of the eye, but the added complexity has only made interpretation and comparison of COF results more difficult

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call