Abstract
Abstract. Droughts will likely become more frequent, greater in magnitude and longer in duration in the future due to climate change. Already in the present climate, a variety of drought events may occur with different exceedance frequencies. These frequencies are becoming more uncertain due to climate change. Many methods in support of drought risk management focus on providing insight into changing drought frequencies, and use water supply reliability as a key decision criterion. In contrast, robustness analysis focuses on providing insight into the full range of drought events and their impact on a system's functionality. This method has been developed for flood risk systems, but applications on drought risk systems are lacking. This paper aims to develop robustness analysis for drought risk systems, and illustrates the approach through a case study with a water supply reservoir and its users. We explore drought characterization and the assessment of a system's ability to deal with drought events, by quantifying the severity and socio-economic impact of a variety of drought events, both frequent and rare ones. Furthermore, we show the effect of three common drought management strategies (increasing supply, reducing demand and implementing hedging rules) on the robustness of the coupled water supply and socio-economic system. The case is inspired by Oologah Lake, a multipurpose reservoir in Oklahoma, United States. Results demonstrate that although demand reduction and supply increase may have a comparable effect on the supply reliability, demand reduction may be preferred from a robustness perspective. To prepare drought management plans for dealing with current and future droughts, it is thus recommended to test how alternative drought strategies contribute to a system's robustness rather than relying solely on water reliability as the decision criterion.
Highlights
1.1 Drought management under uncertaintyDroughts affect more people than any other kind of natural disaster owing to their large-scale and long-lasting nature (WMO, 2013)
This paper proposes new criteria to support decision-making on drought risk management
To explore the potential of robustness analysis in a drought management context, this paper develops the approach for a system exposed to droughts
Summary
1.1 Drought management under uncertaintyDroughts affect more people than any other kind of natural disaster owing to their large-scale and long-lasting nature (WMO, 2013). There is a possibility that droughts will intensify in the 21st century due to reduced precipitation and/or increased evapotranspiration (IPCC, 2012) This means that droughts may become more frequent, greater in magnitude and/or longer in duration. In view of climate change, it is increasingly acknowledged that each country should develop and implement national drought management plans to reduce drought risk to an acceptable level (Wilhite et al, 2014; Sivakumar et al, 2014; OECD, 2013). Such drought plan development can be supported by “stress-testing” water supply systems on drought events that are more severe and/or longer in duration than
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have