Abstract

BackgroundScreening and surveillance of development are integral to ensuring effective early identification and intervention strategies for children with vulnerabilities. However, not all developmental skills have reliable screening processes, such as early language ability.MethodWe describe how a set of early life factors used in a large, prospective community cohort from Australia are associated with language abilities across the preschool years, and determine if either an accumulation of risk factors or a clustering of risk factors provide a feasible approach to surveillance of language development in preschool children.ResultsThere were 1,208 children with a 7-year language outcome. The accumulation of early life factors increased the likelihood of children having low language skills at 7-years. Over a third of children with typical language skills (36.6%) had ≤ two risks and half of the children with low language (50%) had six or more risks. As the number of factors increases the risk of having low language at 7-years increases, for example, children with six or more risks had 17 times greater risk, compared to those with ≤ two risks. Data collected from 1,910 children at 8- to 12-months were used in the latent class modeling. Four profile classes (or groups) were identified. The largest group was developmentally enabled with a supportive home learning environment (56.2%, n = 1,073). The second group was vulnerable, both developmentally and in their home learning environment (31.2%, n = 596); the third group was socially disadvantaged with a vulnerable home learning environment (7.4%, n = 142); the final group featured maternal mental health problems and vulnerable child socio-emotional adjustment (5.2%, n = 99). Compared to developmentally enabled children, the risk of low language at 7-years was greater for children in the three other groups.ConclusionThe cumulative and cluster risk analyses demonstrate the potential to use developmental surveillance to identify children within the first years of life who are at risk of language difficulties. Importantly, parent-child interaction and the home learning environment emerged as a consistent cluster. We recommend they be adopted as the common focus for early intervention and universal language promotion programs.

Highlights

  • Language skills emerge during the first year of life, characterized by periods of swift growth and a relatively consistent sequence of development

  • The analyses reported here aim to describe how a set of early life factors defined initially in Early Language in Victoria Study (ELVS) [9] and added to using a bio-developmental framework [53] are associated with language abilities across the preschool years, and to determine if either an accumulation of risk factors or a clustering of risk factors provide a feasible approach to surveillance of language development in preschool children

  • We selected the optimal number of profiles based on three criteria; first, visual examination of elbow plots of the Akaike Information Criteria (AIC), Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC), and sampleadjusted BIC (SABIC) [67, 68]; second, we considered results for the Bootstrapped likelihood ratio test and Lo-Mendell-Rubin Adjusted test [69]; and third, we used Nylund et al.’s [70] criterion that the posterior probabilities should be >0.70 as evidence that an individual belongs to their assigned profile and no other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Language skills emerge during the first year of life, characterized by periods of swift growth and a relatively consistent sequence of development. Despite these commonalities, a hallmark feature of children’s early language development is noticeable individual variability [1]. Language skills are shaped by biological and environmental factors, and while some of the variability in children’s language skills can be attributed to both from early in life [2], the ongoing challenge has been to better understand and predict different developmental pathways. We provide a summary of major themes from the findings when the children were aged between 8-months and 11-years

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call