Abstract
AbstractInstream flow models link a physical habitat model that predicts flow‐related changes in hydraulics to a biological model that predicts the response of fish to altered velocity and depth. Habitat suitability curves (HSCs) based on frequency of habitat use (fish occurrence relative to available habitat) remain the most widely used biological models in habitat simulations. However, in some contexts fish density may be a poor indicator of habitat quality, leading to biased predictions of optimal flow. We explore the use of bioenergetics to derive mechanistic HSCs based on the fundamental energetics of habitat use. Using flow‐related changes in production of Coho Salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch smolt as reference data to evaluate model predictions, we found that bioenergetic‐based HSCs matched the validation data better than frequency‐based HSCs, which systematically underestimated optimal flows. However, biases remained using bioenergetic HSCs, suggesting that habitat suitability may not be independent of discharge as is often assumed. Declining invertebrate drift concentration, increasing temperature, and density dependence of growth at low flows are potential mechanisms of flow‐related declines in habitat suitability; measuring these effects and incorporating them into flow models is an important step in further improving model predictions, particularly at low flows.Received December 3, 2015; accepted May 11, 2016
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.