Abstract

Abstract. A challenge in establishing new ground-based stations for monitoring snowpack accumulation and ablation is to locate the sites in areas that represent the key processes affecting snow accumulation and ablation. This is especially challenging in forested montane watersheds where the combined effects of terrain, climate, and land cover affect seasonal snowpack. We present a coupled modeling approach used to objectively identify representative snow-monitoring locations in a forested watershed in the western Oregon Cascades mountain range. We used a binary regression tree (BRT) non-parametric statistical model to classify peak snow water equivalent (SWE) based on physiographic landscape characteristics in an average snow year, an above-average snow year, and a below-average snow year. Training data for the BRT classification were derived using spatially distributed estimates of SWE from a validated physically based model of snow evolution. The optimal BRT model showed that elevation and land cover type were the most significant drivers of spatial variability in peak SWE across the watershed (R2 = 0.93, p value < 0.01). Geospatial elevation and land cover data were used to map the BRT-derived snow classes across the watershed. Specific snow-monitoring sites were selected randomly within the dominant BRT-derived snow classes to capture the range of spatial variability in snowpack conditions in the McKenzie River basin. The Forest Elevational Snow Transect (ForEST) is a result of this coupled modeling approach and represents combinations of forested and open land cover types at low, mid-, and high elevations. After 5 years of snowpack monitoring, the ForEST network provides a valuable and detailed dataset of snow accumulation, snow ablation, and snowpack energy balance in forested and open sites from the rain–snow transition zone to the upper seasonal snow zone in the western Oregon Cascades.

Highlights

  • To objectively identify optimal site locations to distribute a snow monitoring network, which explicitly captures the spatial variability of snow accumulation relative to the physiographic landscape, we used a combination of physically based, statistical, and geospatial models. This paper presents this objective and relatively simple methodology to distribute a snow monitoring network, which captures landscapedriven spatial variability in snow accumulation and includes four major objectives: 1. determine the key physiographic drivers of spatial variability in snow accumulation; 2. classify snow classes in the watershed based on key physiographic drivers using a non-parametric statistical model; 3. spatially distribute these snow classes across the watershed, using a geospatial model; 4. select site locations for a snow-monitoring network, which spans the spatial variability in snow water equivalent in the McKenzie River basin

  • The final binary regression tree (BRT) model applied to the high snow year (2008) characterized snow water equivalent (SWE) across the McKenzie River basin (MRB) into 21 snow classes with similar spatial extent as during the normal snow year (2008 BRT model; R2 = 0.95, p value < 0.01, RMSE = 0.18 m) (Fig. 4; Table S1 in the Supplement)

  • The final BRT model applied to the low snow year (2005) characterized SWE across the MRB into 21 snow classes with similar spatial variability relative to land cover but differing extents relative to elevation than during the normal snow year (2005 BRT model; R2 = 0.895, p value < 0.01, RMSE = 0.09 m) (Fig. 4; Table S2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mountain snowpack is declining as a result of the warming climate (Kunkel et al, 2016; Knowles, 2015; Pederson et al, 2011, 2013; Rupp et al, 2013; Mote, 2006), subsequently shifting timing (Fritze et al, 2011; Clow, 2010) and volume of streamflow (Woodhouse et al, 2016; Berghuijs et al, 2014; Luce and Holden, 2009) across the western United States. Luce et al (2013) argued that the declining snowpack is the result of weakening westerlies leading to a decline in mountain precipitation in the interior western USA. The volume and seasonality of water produced from these snow-dominated watersheds varies spatially and temporally as a function of precipitation and temperature (Tennant et al, 2015; Barnett et al, 2005; Regonda et al, 2005), as well as local physiographic effects of topography, geology, and vegetation dynamics (Molotch and Meromy, 2014; Clark et al, 2011; Jefferson et al, 2008; Ffolliott et al, 1989).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call