Abstract

Although research articles (henceforth RA) have been widely used in undergraduate teaching as assigned readings or supplementary teaching materials, studies addressing students' challenges in RA reading are infrequent. We conducted a two-cycle action research to examine the effect of genre instruction on RA reading comprehension of Year 3 and 4 undergraduate students in economics. In Cycle 1, students (n = 34) were introduced to move structures of conventional sections, including Introduction, Method, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion; in Cycle 2, students (n = 34) were introduced to a discipline-specific move model of economics. Apart from the conventional sections, the model used in Cycle 2 also describes the rhetorical structure of discipline-specific sections, such as Theoretical Model, Econometric Model, Robustness, and Mechanisms. Summary writing and multiple-choice tests were used to measure students' improvements in reading comprehension. The findings show that Cycle 2 instruction significantly improved students’ performance in summary writing (medium effect size) and multiple-choice tests (small effect size), whereas Cycle 1 instruction did not. Also, fewer students in Cycle 2 perceived cognitive overload challenges than their peers in Cycle 1. The findings can be useful for EAP practitioners teaching similar cohorts of students.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.