Abstract

Background:Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide basic health screening and advice to members of their own communities. Although CHWs are trained, no CHW programmes have used a formal method to identify the level of achievement on post-training assessments that distinguishes “safe” from “unsafe”.Objectives:The aim of this study was to use Ebel method of standard setting for a post-training written knowledge assessment for CHWs in Neno, Malawi.Methods:12 participants agreed the definitions of a “just-deployment ready” and an “ideal” CHW. Participants rated the importance and difficulty of each question on a three-point scale and also indicated the proportion of “just-deployment ready” CHWs expected to answer each of the nine question types correctly. Mean scores were used to determine the passing standard, which was reduced by one standard error of measurement (SEM) as this was the first time any passing standard had been employed.The level of agreement across participants’ ratings of importance and difficulty was calculated using Krippendorf’s alpha. The assessment results from the first cohort of CHW trainees were analysed using classical test theory.Findings:There was poor agreement between participants on item ratings of both importance and difficulty (Krippendorf’s alphas of 0.064 and 0.074 respectively). The pass mark applied to the assessment, following adjustment using the SEM, was 53.3%. Based on this pass mark, 68% of 129 CHW trainees were ‘clear passes’, 11% ‘borderline passes’, 9% ‘borderline fails’ and 12% ‘clear fails’.Conclusions:Determining whether a CHW is deployment-ready is an important, but difficult exercise, as evidenced by a lack of agreement regarding question importance and difficulty. Future exercises should allow more time for training, discussion and modification of ratings. Based on the assessment, most CHWs trained could be considered deployment-ready, but following-up their performance in the field will be vital to validate the pass mark set.

Highlights

  • Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide a wide range of services including basic health promotion, counselling and care within the communities in which they live, providing a critical link between communities and health systems [1, 2]

  • Characteristics of the standard setting panel The twelve-member standard setting panel consisted of nine members from Partners In Health (PIH) and three from the Malawian Ministry of Health (25%)

  • This requires the use of post-training assessments that are blueprinted to the program requirements, include wellwritten and quality-assessed items and where the borderline between pass and fail has been established using an appropriate method of standard setting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Community Health Workers (CHWs) provide a wide range of services including basic health promotion, counselling and care within the communities in which they live, providing a critical link between communities and health systems [1, 2]. To determine whether a CHW is ready to be deployed into the field (often to work by themselves), a program provider needs to know what minimum score is indicative of ‘minimum competence’ or readiness for safe deployment. The need for such a minimum score, or pass mark, can be implied from the studies of Workman et al [15] and Kalyango et al [16] Workman et al [15]. Objectives: The aim of this study was to use Ebel method of standard setting for a post-training written knowledge assessment for CHWs in Neno, Malawi. Mean scores were used to determine the passing standard, which was reduced by one standard error of measurement (SEM) as this was the first time any passing standard had been employed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call