Abstract

The onset of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 has changed many aspects of people’s economic and social activities. For many airlines, social distancing has reduced airplane capacity by one third as a result of keeping the middle seats empty. Additionally, social distancing between passengers traversing the aisle slows the boarding process. Recent literature has suggested that the reverse pyramid boarding method provides favorable values for boarding time and passenger health metrics when compared to other boarding methods with social distancing. Assuming reverse pyramid boarding with the middle seats unoccupied, we determined the number of passengers to include in each of three boarding groups. We assumed that passengers use a jet-bridge that connects the airport terminal to the airplane’s front door. We used agent-based modeling and a stochastic simulation to evaluate solutions. A full grid search found an initial good solution, and then local search optimization determined the best solution based upon the airline’s relative preference for minimizing average boarding time and minimizing risks to previously seated passengers from later-boarding, potentially contagious passengers breathing near them. The resulting solution contained the number of passengers to place into each of the three boarding groups. If an airline is most concerned about the health risk to seated passengers from later boarding passengers walking near them, the best three-group reverse pyramid method adapted for social distancing will first board passengers with window seats in the rear half of the airplane, then will board passengers with window seats in the front half of the airplane and those with aisle seats in the rear half of the airplane, and finally will board the passengers with aisle seats in the front half of the airplane. The resulting solution takes about 2% longer to board than the three-group solution that minimizes boarding time while providing a 25% decrease in health risk to aisle seat passengers from later boarding passengers.

Highlights

  • Due to the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2, social distancing has changed the way business is conducted in many industries

  • Based on the performance indicators favored by airline, we provide the number of passengers to assign to the airline, we provide the number of passengers to assign each of the three boarding groups when using the reverse pyramid

  • The novel coronavirus and the social distancing rules imposed by the authorities and the institutions in the area of air transport management have changed the airplane boarding process

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the spread of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2, social distancing has changed the way business is conducted in many industries. In a recent study commissioned by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) regarding passengers’ perception on the aviation industry in times of the pandemic [1], only 12% of passengers indicated that they will not wait to return to their typical travel plans. The same report [1] indicated that even after the pandemic subsides, people expect to travel less: 66% of the respondents indicated that they are somewhat likely or very likely to travel less for business or leisure. These results are in line with projections made by the International Civil

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call