Abstract
In addition to being a social need, fighting against crime, has a political function and provides the acceptance and legitimacy of political systems. For this reason, the government’s policy of suppression, reduction and prevention of crime, concerns the public opinion. It is necessary that, the best and the most efficient way is selected to fight crime with the help of scientific technology. In the present article entitled “Determining the advantages and disadvantages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crime” we have been trying to serve the purpose of determining the advantages and disadvantages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crimes and explain the best way to fight against violent crimes, taking into account social needs, the analytical methods and the use of all library resources to answer the questions; what processes has the criminal policy of Iran regarded to prevent violent crimes? How has the Populist criminal policy been expressed in legislation of Iran? Finally, what are the results of the populist criminal policy? The results of the study show that the Populist criminal policy has always existed in the Iranian legal system, the example of which is seen in the law of intensification of punishments for the perpetrators of embezzlement, bribery and fraud.
Highlights
The first thing that comes to mind about the so-called crimes of vio lence, is crimes such as assault, murder and conflict
Legislator, in dealing with this kinds of crimes, as well as former category has used intensity and considered them in the form o f penalties with the significant degree of misdemeanor or felony in violent crimes against properties; In this sense it can be said that such a strict approach in the Penal Code is well visible both in offen ses against persons and against p ro p erties
Strict criminal policy against violent cri me in the Iranian legal system Strict criminal policy in the Iran ian legal system is observed in many n -vio lent crimes, whether it is petty or not
Summary
In addition to being a social need, fighting against crime, has a polit ical function and provides the acceptance and legitimacy of polit ical systems. For this reason, the government’s policy of suppression, reduction and prevention of crime, concerns the public opinion. In the present article entitled “Determining the advantages and disadvantages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crime” we have been trying to serve the purpose of determining the advantages and disadvant ages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crimes and exp lain the best way to fight against violent crimes, taking into account social needs, the analytical methods and the use of all library resources to answer the questions; what processes has the criminal policy of Iran regarded to prevent violent crimes? In the present article entitled “Determining the advantages and disadvantages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crime” we have been trying to serve the purpose of determining the advantages and disadvant ages of the legal system's selection policy in response to violent crimes and exp lain the best way to fight against violent crimes, taking into account social needs, the analytical methods and the use of all library resources to answer the questions; what processes has the criminal policy of Iran regarded to prevent violent crimes? Ho w has the Populist criminal policy been expressed in legislation of Iran? what are the results of the populist criminal policy? The results of the study show that the Populist crimina l policy has always e xisted in the Iranian legal system, the e xa mp le of which is seen in the law of intensificat ion of punishments for the perpetrators of embezzlement, bribery and fraud
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have