Abstract

The wake of a wind turbine is a crucial factor that decreases the output of downstream wind turbines and causes unsteady loading. Various wake models have been developed to understand it, ranging from simple ones to elaborate models that require long calculation times. However, selecting an appropriate wake model is difficult because each model has its advantages and disadvantages as well as distinct characteristics. Furthermore, determining the parameters of a given wake model is crucial because this affects the calculation results. In this study, a method was introduced of using the turbulence intensity, which can be measured onsite, to objectively define parameters that were previously set according to the subjective judgement of a wind farm designer or general recommended values. To reflect the environmental effects around a site, the turbulence intensity in each direction of the wind farm was considered for four types of analytical wake models: the Jensen, Frandsen, Larsen, and Jensen–Gaussian models. The prediction performances of the wake models for the power deficit and energy production of the wind turbines were compared to data collected from a wind farm. The results showed that the Jensen and Jensen–Gaussian models agreed more with the power deficit distribution of the downstream wind turbines than when the same general recommended parameters were applied in all directions. When applied to energy production, the maximum difference among the wake models was approximately 3%. Every wake model clearly showed the relative wake loss tendency of each wind turbine.

Highlights

  • In a wind farm, wind turbines exchange wake effects with each another

  • Wind turbines exchange wake effects with each another. This causes wake loss, where the wake of a wind turbine decreases the power of turbines located downstream. This wake loss is inevitable in a wind farm, and many studies have focused on minimizing wake effects to optimize the wind farm layout [1,2]

  • The power deficit due to wakes and the energy production reflecting wake loss for an onshore farm were compared for four analytical wake models (Jensen, Frandsen, Larsen, and Jensen–Gaussian)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wind turbines exchange wake effects with each another. This causes wake loss, where the wake of a wind turbine decreases the power of turbines located downstream. Göçmen et al [30] compared analytical models (Jensen, Larsen) and numerical models (DWM, Fuga, Ellipsys3D LES and RANS) with data collected from onshore (Sexbierum) and offshore (Lillgrund) wind farms. Archer et al [31] compared the power deficits for offshore wind turbines with a regular layout (Lillgrund), offshore wind turbines with an irregular layout (Anholt), and onshore wind turbines with a regular layout (Nørrekær) using six analytical models (Jensen, Larsen, Frandsen, XA, BPA, and GM) They found that the Jensen and XA (Gaussian-based) models showed excellent results and recommended the Jensen and Frandsen models for wind farm layout optimization.

Jensen Wake Model
Frandsen Wake Model
Larsen Wake Model
Jensen–Gaussian Wake Model
Partial and Multiple Wakes
Wake Model Parameters
Wind Farm Layout
Power Deficit Comparison
Energy
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.