Abstract

Practical, easy-to-use and cheap methods are needed to analyze quality traits of maize grain in breeding programs or industrial areas. NIR (Near Infrared) spectroscopy is regarded a method providing such advantages. The objective of this study is to compare different calibration models that could be used in the analysis of protein, oil, and ash contents in maize flour by NIRs. A total of 138 samples were used from 115 hybrids and 23 inbreds in the study as material. Based on reference analysis results, different estimation models were developed using Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) methods. Validation procedure of these models (n=110) were accomplished using samples from different genotypes (n=28). In both of the developed models, the highest accuracy was attained for protein content (r=0.99 for both MLR and PLSR). For the other traits analyzed, although MLR model yielded better results based on mathematical evaluations (r MLR =0.80, r PLSR =0.75 for carbohydrate, r MLR =0.82, r PLSR =0.72 for oil, r MLR =0.93 and r PLSR =0.81 for ash), external validation suggested PLSR model provide a lower error rate than MLR. Profile analysis regarding the wavelengths potent in the models showed that the estimation power declined when the regression coefficients of the wavelengths included in the model were low. Among the analyzed traits, ash and oil contents seemed to be related with more spectral regions within the scanned spectra than protein and carbohydrate.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call