Abstract
We report the final part of our "on-line yield" pilot program in this article. This last part deals with aspects of accuracy and precision of the determination of cobalt in biological materials by RNAA with on-line yield determination. To obtain an insight into the accuracy of the technique, certified reference materials were analyzed, and for selected materials, results obtained by INAA and RNAA of identical samples have been compared. It shows that the mineralization in our RNAA scheme may be a sample-related source of systematic errors that is not related to the presence or absence of HF. Finally, we present some critical notes on pros and cons of the practice of on-line yield concept and some ideas for further research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
