Abstract

Two different extraction procedures to determine alachlor (2-chloro-2′,6′-diethyl-N-methoxymethyl-acetanilide) and its metabolites 2,6-diethylaniline (DEA) and 2-chloro-2′,6′-diethylacetanilide (CDEA) at very low concentration levels in groundwater are compared. Both methods were performed during a field leaching study and laboratory soil column experiments. Solid phase extraction (SPE) is characterized by the enrichment of 11 water samples at 1 g RP-C18 material, while micro liquid/liquid extraction (MLLE) means that 400 ml water samples saturated with sodium chloride were extracted once with 500 μl of toluene. Both methods differ in their concentration factors, i.e. 5000 for SPE and 800 for MLLE. The determination limits for alachlor determined as the lowest spiked concentration analyzed are 10 ng/l with SPE and 25 ng/l with MLLE. Even though the determination limits of the two methods are similar, the volatile metabolite 2,6-diethylaniline was not sufficiently recovered by SPE. Furthermore, SPE is more expensive and time consuming than MLLE. The latter is simple in use, rapidly performed and needs no evaporation step and clean-up before GC analysis. This is of special advantage for the analysis of 2,6-diethylaniline. The determination limits of the metabolites CDEA and DEA analyzed by MLLE are 25 ng/l. The extracts from both methods were directly analyzed by gas chromatography using electron capture and nitrogen-phosphorus detection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call