Abstract

The temperate bacteriophage HK022, like its relative λ, inserts its chromosome into a specific site in the bacterial chromosome during lysogenization and excises it after induction. However, we find that the recombinational specificities of the two phages differ: they use different bacterial sites, and neither promotes efficient insertion or excision of the other phage chromosome. In order to determine the basis for this difference in specificity, we sequenced the HK022 elements that are involved in insertion and excision, and compared them to the corresponding λ elements. The location, orientation, size and overall arrangement of the int and xis genes and the phage attachment sites are nearly identical in the two genomes, as is common for other functionally related elements in lambdoid phages. The Xis proteins of the two phages are functionally interchangeable, and their predicted amino acid sequences differ by but one residue. In contrast, the two Int proteins are not functionally interchangeable, and their sequences, although similar, differ at many positions. These sequence differences are not uniformly distributed: the amino-terminal 55 residues are completely conserved, but the remaining 302 show a pattern of differences interspersed with identities and conservative changes. These findings imply that the specificity difference between HK022 and λ site-specific recombination is a consequence of the inability of the respective Int proteins to recognize pairs of heterologous attachment sites. The two phage attachment sites are remarkably similar, especially the two “arm” segments, which in λ contain binding sites for Int, Xis and integration host factor. They are less similar in the segment between the two arms, which in λ contains the points of recombinational strand exchange and a second class of binding site for Int protein (the “core-type” sites). The two bacterial attachment sites are quite different, although both have a short stretch of perfect homology with their respective phage partners at the points of strand exchange. We propose that the two Int proteins recognize similar or identical sites in the arms of their cognate attachment sites, and that differences in binding or action at the core-type sites is responsible for the divergent specificities. Genetic experiments and sequence comparisons suggest that both proteins recognize different but overlapping families of core-type sites, and that divergence in specificity has been achieved by an alternating succession of small, mutually compatible changes in protein and site.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.