Abstract
The aim of the article is to disclose some general trends in scientific discourse studies that have emerged by the second decade of the 21 st century, to characterize scientific discourse as a means of promoting knowledge, and to consider its contribution to public communication. The notion of scientific discourse incorporates both conventional (scientific articles, reviews, theses, dissertation abstracts) and modern forms of discourse (online academic conferences, symposia, colloquiums, seminars). The research is viewed in the article as a result of scientists' social activity targeted at new knowledge discovery and broadcasting, whilst the scientific text is defined in terms of verbal representation of the research results in a par with new knowledge transmission. Two types of determinants are introduced to regulate the model of scientific text composition – internal and external. The internal determinant is represented by discursive structures, which promote knowledge in scientific text as the element of scientific communication, while the external dominant is represented by extralinguistic factors, which provide the promotion of scientific discourse outside the professional community (socializing). Воth kinds of determinants provide the interpretation of the scientific discourse as open systems. An assumption is made on the increasing role of external determinant in discursive extension of modern scientific text by means of the Internet; the addressee factor wider representation and scientific knowledge inclusion into cross-cultural communication.
Highlights
The aim of the article is to disclose some general trends in scientific discourse studies that have emerged by the second decade of the 21st century, to characterize scientific discourse as a means of promoting knowledge, and to consider its contribution to public communication
The following symbols are used in the table: “+” – current studies; “*” – studies actual for the late 20th century only; “–” – almost no studies
Например: Standpoints need to be brought to the fore and confronted with the doubt and criticism of those concerned to test their acceptability
Summary
В таблице использованы следующие обозначения: «+» – активно проходящие исследования; «*» – актуальные только для конца XX в.; «–» – практически полное отсутствие исследований. The following symbols are used in the table: “+” – current studies; “*” – studies actual for the late 20th century only; “–” – almost no studies. К отмеченным выше направлениям лингвистического анализа научного текста / дискурса прибавилось изучение отражения в тексте процесса формирования нового знания и его интерпретации. Цели нашего исследования – определить общие тенденции лингвистического изучения научного дискурса, сложившиеся ко второму десятилетию XXI в. И охарактеризовать дискурс науки с точки зрения производства и представления знания и его включенности в широкую коммуникацию Цели нашего исследования – определить общие тенденции лингвистического изучения научного дискурса, сложившиеся ко второму десятилетию XXI в. и охарактеризовать дискурс науки с точки зрения производства и представления знания и его включенности в широкую коммуникацию
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
