Abstract

Background Nonresponding pneumonia is responsible for the most mortality of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, thus far, it is not clear whether viral infection plays an important role in the etiology of nonresponding CAP and whether there is a significant difference in the clinical characteristics between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP. Methods From 2016 to 2019, nonresponding CAP patients were retrospectively enrolled in our study. All patients received bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and virus detection in BAL fluid by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were collected. Results A total of 43 patients were included. The median age was 62 years, and 65.1% of patients were male. Overall, 20 patients (46.5%) were identified with viral infection. Of these viruses, influenza virus (n = 8) and adenovirus (n = 7) were more frequently detected, and others included herpes simplex virus, human enterovirus, cytomegalovirus, human coronavirus 229E, rhinovirus, and parainfluenza virus. Compared with nonviral nonresponding CAP, only ground-glass opacity combined with consolidation was a more common imaging manifestation in viral nonresponding CAP. However, no obvious differences were found in clinical and laboratory findings between the presence and the absence of viral infections. Conclusions Viral infections were particularly frequent in adults with nonresponding CAP. The ground-glass opacity combined with consolidation was a specific imaging manifestation for viral nonresponding CAP, while the clinical and laboratory data showed no obvious differences between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP.

Highlights

  • In 2016, lower respiratory infections caused more than two million deaths in people of all ages all over the world [1], which made lower respiratory infections the fourth top cause of deaths

  • A study on etiological detection of 2320 pneumonia patients completed by Jain S [7] in 2015 showed that the detection rate of virus unexpectedly reached 27%, and another community-acquired pneumonia (CAP)-China network study showed that the positive rate of virus in 2336 hospitalized patients with CAP was 39% [13]. Far, it is not clear whether viral infection plays an important role in the etiology of nonresponding CAP and whether there is a significant difference in the clinical characteristics between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP

  • Forty-three of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid specimens were obtained from nonresponding CAP patients. 29 patients (67.4%) had respiratory virus or bacteria identified, of which 20 patients (46.5%) had viral infection and 18

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2016, lower respiratory infections caused more than two million deaths in people of all ages all over the world [1], which made lower respiratory infections the fourth top cause of deaths. As a leading cause of lower respiratory infections, community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) leads to morbidity and mortality throughout the world in all age groups. Nonresponding pneumonia is responsible for the most mortality of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) Far, it is not clear whether viral infection plays an important role in the etiology of nonresponding CAP and whether there is a significant difference in the clinical characteristics between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP. 20 patients (46.5%) were identified with viral infection Of these viruses, influenza virus (n 8) and adenovirus (n 7) were more frequently detected, and others included herpes simplex virus, human enterovirus, cytomegalovirus, human coronavirus 229E, rhinovirus, and parainfluenza virus. E ground-glass opacity combined with consolidation was a specific imaging manifestation for viral nonresponding CAP, while the clinical and laboratory data showed no obvious differences between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP Viral infections were frequent in adults with nonresponding CAP. e ground-glass opacity combined with consolidation was a specific imaging manifestation for viral nonresponding CAP, while the clinical and laboratory data showed no obvious differences between viral and nonviral nonresponding CAP

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call