Abstract

Auditory deviance detection in humans is indexed by the mismatch negativity (MMN), a component of the auditory evoked potential (AEP) of the electroencephalogram (EEG) occurring at a latency of 100–250 ms after stimulus onset. However, by using classic oddball paradigms, differential responses to regularity violations of simple auditory features have been found at the level of the middle latency response (MLR) of the AEP occurring within the first 50 ms after stimulus (deviation) onset. These findings suggest the existence of fast deviance detection mechanisms for simple feature changes, but it is not clear whether deviance detection among more complex acoustic regularities could be observed at such early latencies. To test this, we examined the pre-attentive processing of rare stimulus repetitions in a sequence of tones alternating in frequency in both long and middle latency ranges. Additionally, we introduced occasional changes in the interaural time difference (ITD), so that a simple-feature regularity could be examined in the same paradigm. MMN was obtained for both repetition and ITD deviants, occurring at 150 ms and 100 ms after stimulus onset respectively. At the level of the MLR, a difference was observed between standards and ITD deviants at the Na component (20–30 ms after stimulus onset), for 800 Hz tones, but not for repetition deviants. These findings suggest that detection mechanisms for deviants to simple regularities, but not to more complex regularities, are already activated in the MLR range, supporting the view that the auditory deviance detection system is organized in a hierarchical manner.

Highlights

  • In order to give optimal responses to changes in the environment, auditory inputs need to be processed in a fast and efficient way

  • The repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no main effect of Frequency (F(1,23) = 0.453, p = 0.508), but there was a main effect of Stimulus Type (F(1,23) = 97.678, p,0.001)

  • Two levels of auditory deviance detection were examined for two different types of auditory regularities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In order to give optimal responses to changes in the environment, auditory inputs need to be processed in a fast and efficient way. While a modulation of the MLR has been observed to simple regularity violations in oddball paradigms, it is yet to be determined whether deviations to complex regularities might be detected at these earlier stages To answer this question, we examined different levels of auditory change detection in a tonealternation paradigm [26]. In addition to the tone repetitions, we introduced occasional changes in the interaural time difference (ITD) of the tones, leading to a perceived sound location change This way we could examine a regularity based on a feature representation in which an enhancement of the Na component to the deviants was already reported [19,20]. Deviance detection was studied at the level of the MLR and the MMN for both types of regularity violations

Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.