Abstract

BackgroundInfective endocarditis is a life-threatening uncommon infectious disease, and we aimed to explore the clinical utility of venous or arterial blood-based metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) approaches to diagnose left-sided infective endocarditis (LSIE). MethodsWe prospectively studied 79 LSIE patients who received valvular surgery in our hospital. Results of blood culture, valve culture, venous blood-based mNGS, arterial blood-based mNGS, venous blood-based mNGS plus blood culture, and arterial blood-based mNGS plus blood culture were evaluated and compared. ResultsBoth venous blood- and arterial blood-based mNGS methods displayed significantly higher positive detection rates than blood culture and valve culture (43.0 %, 49.4 % vs. 32.9 %, 19.0 %; P < 0.001). Strikingly, when combining blood-based mNGS and blood culture, the positive rate could be further improved to more than 60 %. Moreover, we found mNGS LSIE detection was closely associated with preoperative leukocyte (P = 0.027), neutrophil value (P = 0.018), vegetation ≥ 14 mm (P = 0.043), and vegetations in aortic valve (P = 0.048). In addition, we discovered that blood-based mNGS had a superir capacity over blood culture to detect gram-negative bacteria, fungi, Bartonella Quintana, and mixed infections than blood culture. ConclusionThis study indicates that venous blood- and arterial blood-based mNGS displayed high positive rate in the rapid detection of pathogens in high-risk LSIE patients.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call