Detection of molecular residual disease in stage II and III melanoma utilizing circulating tumor DNA.

Abstract

e21564 Background: Overall survival for patients with melanoma has significantly improved with advancements in immunotherapy, especially with immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors becoming standard of care for advanced melanoma. However, the decision to proceed with adjuvant therapy should be considered against the risk of adverse side effects, particularly in early-stage melanoma patients. Accurate biomarkers are needed to risk stratify patients, determine who will most likely benefit from adjuvant therapy, and identify when the ideal time is to initiate treatment. This study evaluates the prognostic value of personalized, tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in patients with stage II and III melanoma. Methods: In this real-world study, plasma samples (n =429) were analyzed from 90 stage IIA-IIID cutaneous melanoma patients treated at Rush University Medical Center between 03/30/2021 and 01/30/2024. A clinically-validated, personalized, tumor-informed 16-plex PCR assay (SignateraTM, Natera, Inc.) was used for detection and quantification of ctDNA in plasma samples. Results: Personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assays were created using tissue samples from either initial biopsy or surgical excision specimen. Assay design was successful for 100% (90/90) of patients with sufficient tissue; test requests for 4 patients could not proceed due to insufficient tissue. ctDNA was detectable in 28% (25/90) of patients at one or more time points. There was a higher ctDNA-positivity rate in stage III patients (20/50, 40%) compared to stage II patients (5/40, 13%). Of the 25 patients with identifiable ctDNA during surveillance, 13 tested positive on the initial test (2 stage II and 11 stage III). Eighteen of the 25 ctDNA-positive patients received immunotherapy; eight patients achieved sustained ctDNA clearance, 2 had transient clearance, 2 have remained positive on ctDNA testing, and 6 continue to receive adjuvant IO and follow-up ctDNA testing. Clinical or radiographic recurrence occurred in 11/90 patients, 10 of whom tested positive for ctDNA. Conclusions: Personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA offers an adjunct to conventional monitoring for melanoma patients to detect molecular residual disease and was found to be prognostic in our patient cohort. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the role of ctDNA in clinical decision making for surveillance imaging intervals and appropriate initiation, intensification, or discontinuation of adjuvant therapy.