Abstract

Effective conservation management requires an understanding of the source and direction of the many interactions that occur within ecological communities. Without this understanding, management interventions such as control or eradication of introduced species can have unexpected and undesirable outcomes. One of the challenges for wildlife managers is to garner relevant information for their site of management. In this paper we describe how images of mammals captured on remote cameras can be used to uncover behavioral interactions that can in turn help to identify and prioritize areas for more explicit research or management. Our cameras were set repeatedly at four sites over three years in Tasmania, Australia, and we used a series of generalized linear mixed models to interpret relative changes in count data of three species of small mammals: the introduced black rat Rattus rattus, and the native long‐tailed mouse Pseudomys higginsi and swamp rat Rattus lutreolus velutinus. We also included two potential predators, the introduced feral cat Felis catus and the native Tasmanian devil Sarcophilus harrisii. We found that counts of the two species of native small mammals were correlated positively with each other, that swamp rats had a negative effect on black rats, and that black rats had a negative effect on the long‐tailed mouse. Devils were important effects in most small mammal models. Despite their effect probably being underestimated by the remote camera survey method, feral cats were included in models for the long‐tailed mouse. On the basis of the inclusion of native and both species of introduced mammals in long‐tailed mouse models, we propose that the long‐tailed mouse is a priority for further research. This research should clarify the competitive dominance and predatory pressure exerted by the black rat and feral cat, respectively, on this species, and also the potential for management of either introduced species to increase the impact of the other. We conclude that remote cameras can help to uncover cryptic or unsuspected interactions within ecological communities, and hence provide an informed basis for developing targeted research questions to increase the effectiveness of wildlife management.

Highlights

  • Understanding the source and direction of ecological interactions is an important precursor to the effective conservation of threatened species and to the management of invasive species or native pests

  • There was a low count of devils in the Wellington Ranges, the Tasman Peninsula recorded the highest counts of native small mammals and feral cats, and Mt Field had the highest count of devils (Table 2)

  • Tests for black rats as a fixed effect in long-tailed mouse and swamp rat models at three sites revealed that black rats, feral cats and especially devils had important negative effects, whereas the swamp rat had a positive effect on counts of long-tailed mice (Table 3B, Fig. 3B)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the source and direction of ecological interactions is an important precursor to the effective conservation of threatened species and to the management of invasive species or native pests. Predation and inter- and intraspecific competition are among the most pervasive interactions between introduced mammals and their native counterparts (Dickman 2011) and, together with factors such as resource availability and disturbance, can markedly affect species’ activity and abundance (Bruno et al 2003) Disentangling these factors and identifying their relative influence are important generally for understanding the drivers of population dynamics (Ward et al 2010), and are even more crucial for predicting the outcomes of management interventions (Caughley and Gunn 1996, Fox and Monamy 2007)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call