Abstract

Objective Dyslexia diagnosis is a challenging task, since traditional diagnosis methods are not based on biological markers but on behavioural tests. Although dyslexia diagnosis has been addressed by these tests in clinical practice, it is difficult to extract information about the brain processes involved in the different tasks and, then, to go deeper into its biological basis. Thus, the use of biomarkers can contribute not only to the diagnosis but also to a better understanding of specific learning disorders such as dyslexia. In this work, we use Electroencephalography (EEG) signals to discover differences among controls and dyslexic subjects using signal processing and artificial intelligence techniques. Specifically, we measure phase synchronization among channels, to reveal the functional brain network activated during auditory processing. On the other hand, to explore synchronicity patterns risen by low-level auditory processing, we used specific stimuli consisting in band-limited white noise, modulated in amplitude at different frequencies. The differential information contained in the functional (i.e., synchronization) network has been processed by an anomaly detection system that addresses the problem of subjects variability by an outlier-detection method based on vector quantization. The results, obtained for 7 years-old children, show that the proposed method constitutes an useful tool for clinical use, with the area under ROC curve (AUC) values up to 0.95 in differential diagnosis tasks.

Highlights

  • Communications Engineering Department, University of Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain; Andalusian Research Institute in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (DaSCI), Department of Signal Theory, Networking and Communications, University of Granada, 18014 Granada, Spain

  • Since data corresponding to 4.8 and 16 Hz stimuli are stored in the EEG database, we carried out experiments to determine the discriminative power of the different stimuli

  • It is worth noting that this classification methodology is assessed by stratified k-fold cross-validation (k = 5), in order to estimate the generalization errs edit test was performed for each band

Read more

Summary

Methods

Control and experimental groups are extracted by a carefully screening process from a cohort (N = 700) followed from 4 years to the second evaluation of 7 years in 20 different primary schools (Junta de Andalucía). EEG was recorded during 5-min sessions at a sampling rate of 500 Hz, while presenting an auditory stimulus to the subject. These auditory stimuli consisted on white noise 100% amplitude modulated at 4.8 Hz and 16 Hz

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call