Abstract

The adoption of crowdsourcing systems to support successful and effective collaboration among actors to perform a variety of tasks continues to grow. The success of such systems relies on actor willingness to contribute to task achievement in pursuit of a collective goal. This willingness may be negatively affected under certain circumstances. One area where this is the case is work progressing insufficiently or even grinding down to a halt. Such situations can be referred to as impasses and this has been captured more formally in the form of the Stasis pattern in previous work. In this paper, we first investigate the various forms stasis can take, next we characterize these forms in the form of a classification problem, and finally, detect their presence and predict the likelihood of their future occurrence in a practical setting. The latter is achieved through an exploratory case study involving computational analyses of development activities within an open-source crowd-sourced software platform (GitHub). Our findings contribute towards a rich understanding of stasis in crowdsourcing systems and how its various forms can be detected early (and thus mitigated) or even prevented altogether. As such, this work helps improve the chances of successful collaboration through the use of these systems.

Highlights

  • Crowdsourcing refers to the engagement of public actors in specific tasks defined by project owners or other contributors [13]

  • We focus on one particular form of destructive actor dynamic in the context of crowdsourcing systems, namely stasis and we explore its various manifestations

  • The result of the computational analysis showed that all three identified forms of stasis are present in these data sets and demonstrated how this can be visualized

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Crowdsourcing refers to the engagement of public actors in specific tasks defined by project owners or other contributors [13]. Stasis refers to ‘‘the lack of progress in a contributed task due to inaction or adversarial action by contributors’’ [3] In crowdsourcing systems such as Wikipedia, stasis manifests itself through revert cycles and back and forth interactions between participants over a period of time without any resolution. Brandes and Lerner [4] discusses undoing another editor’s work as a fundamental drawback of platforms such as Wikipedia, making progress impossible Another manifestation of stasis is the lack of contribution by actors.

RELATED WORK
EXPLORATORY CASE STUDY
Findings
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.