Abstract
Dynamical systems theory suggests that ecosystems may exhibit alternative dynamical attractors. Such alternative attractors, as for example equilibria and cycles, have been found in the dynamics of experimental systems. Yet, for natural systems, where multiple biotic and abiotic factors simultaneously affect population dynamics, it is more challenging to distinguish alternative dynamical behaviors. Although recent research exemplifies that some natural systems can exhibit alternative states, a robust methodology for testing whether these constitute distinct dynamical attractors is currently lacking. Here, using attractor reconstruction techniques we develop such a test. Applications of the methodology to simulated, experimental and natural time series data, reveal that alternative dynamical behaviors are hard to distinguish if population dynamics are governed by purely stochastic processes. However, if population dynamics are brought about also by mechanisms internal to the system, alternative attractors can readily be detected. Since many natural populations display evidence of such internally driven dynamics, our approach offers a method for empirically testing whether ecosystems exhibit alternative dynamical attractors.
Highlights
Dynamical systems theory suggests that ecosystems may exhibit alternative dynamical attractors
A key result derived from this theory, a common feature of non-linear mathematical models, is that novel dynamical regimes may arise through perturbations affecting either parameter values or state variables of a system[2]
A number of studies indicate that natural systems may exhibit alternative attractors[3,11,12,13,14,15], yet to our knowledge, only one study has thoroughly investigated if the temporal dynamics in an ecosystem is qualitatively different pre and post a critical transition
Summary
Dynamical systems theory suggests that ecosystems may exhibit alternative dynamical attractors. A number of studies indicate that natural systems may exhibit alternative attractors[3,11,12,13,14,15], yet to our knowledge, only one study has thoroughly investigated if the temporal dynamics in an ecosystem is qualitatively different pre and post a critical transition. In this study, it was found through visual inspection of time series that trajectories were qualitatively different pre and post an induced trophic cascade in a whole lake experiment[16]. If regimes (attractors) are dynamically dissimilar we expect significantly lower prediction errors for within than across regime (attractor) predictions, and test if prediction errors of within and across regime predictions are significantly different
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have