Abstract

This article discusses determination of prevailing thinking style of students with possible typology of the thinking styles. Determination of prevailing thinking style is required to determine strategy and tactics of teaching and maximum use of student-centered results of the performed diagnostics during designing further successful subject–subject interaction. The relevance of the considered problem is related with the necessity to resolve the issue of optimum use of individual features of students’ thinking, future lawyers, regarding development of analytical thinking style. It is proposed that the research method should be based on the diagnostics by A. Alekseev and L. Gromova, Individual Thinking Styles, its aim is analysis of individual thinking styles. It has been established that the proposed method provides analysis of basic thinking styles of the students: synthetic, idealistic, pragmatic, analytical, realistic. The obtained data would allow each teacher to design respective arrangement of subjectsubject interactions and to rearrange methods of teaching the involved discipline with orientation at personal features of cognitive tools of each student individually and in overall group.

Highlights

  • Psychological and pedagogic publications provide expansive materials on analysis of various forms of interaction between student and teacher in vocational education system

  • The presented comparison and the study in whole evidence that most first-year students specialized in Law and organization of social security at Timiryasov Innovative University (Kazan) do not prefer any thinking style with slight preference of analytical style

  • The study has allowed to highlight some students with strong preference of analytical thinking style, who could act as close assistants–moderators upon further organization of subject-subject interrelations in various forms of educational activity in subsequent years of study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Psychological and pedagogic publications provide expansive materials on analysis of various forms of interaction between student and teacher in vocational education system (O.Yu Antonov, S.R. Bondareva, T.Yu. Dzhamalova, M.A. Izmailova, Yu.V. Kolosova, R.Z. Lafisheva, G.E. Prokhorova, O.B. Russkova, T.S. Seyfedova, V.Ya. Skvirskii et al.) [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call