Abstract
Abstract Traditionally, the screening of thermodynamic models in phase equilibria is carried out based on the full data set and, therefore, after having obtained all the experimental points. The aim of this work is to show that sequential model discrimination may be used as a guide for obtaining experimental data for systems at high pressures. We have compared two discrimination procedures in order to select the next experimental point, one of them considering only the predicted responses (Hunter and Reiner [1]) and the other taking also into account the error limit inherent to each model (Ferraris and Forzatti [2]). In order to test these methodologies, literature data were used along with current thermodynamic models. It is shown that the sequential discrimination leads to the same conclusions as obtained when using the full data set, but with much less effort.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.