Abstract

Active learning tools are critical in imparting real world experiences to the students within a classroom environment. This is important because graduates are expected to develop software that meets rigorous quality standards in functional and application domains with little to no training. However, there is a well-recognized need for the availability of effective active tools. This need has been addressed by the authors by designing, developing, and delivering, twenty delivery hours of Case Studies, sixteen delivery hours of Class Exercises, and six delivery hours of Video Case Studies for use in V&V courses. The active learning tools focus on some specific SV&V topics such as requirements engineering, software reviews, configuration management, and software testing. Four key skill areas sought after by employers, namely communication skills, applied knowledge of methods, applied knowledge of tools, and research exposure have been used to drive the development funded by a National Science Foundation grant and perfected through an industry-academia partnership. These tools have been successfully disseminated to over 25 universities with many CS, IS, SE programs incorporating the tools in their existing courses and others designing new courses based on these tools.In this paper we present data on the student feedback and pedagogical effectiveness of the strategies used to effectively incorporate and deliver the developed active learning tools by instructors at two universities. Traditional and flipped classroom delivery strategies are discussed as well as topics like pre-requisite knowledge preparation prior to class, course module presentation sequence, homework, team/individual work, collaborative discussions, and assessment tools are deliberated. The student questionnaire data from the two University Partners who used the V&V instructional activities were quite positive and showed that students were interested in the activities, saw the real-world applications, and communicated with their classmates as they solved the problems. Educational outcomes assessment demonstrated more effective learning in all key learning areas.

Highlights

  • Imparting real world experiences is often a challenge due to both lack of effective active learning tools and delivery strategies

  • The lack of effective active learning tools has been addressed by the authors at Robert Morris University by designing, developing, delivering, and disseminating twenty delivery hours of Case Studies, sixteen delivery hours of Class Exercises, and six delivery hours of Video Case Studies for use in courses that impart knowledge on SV&V topics viz. requirements engineering, software reviews, configuration management, and software testing

  • Results from the Summer Workshop Surveys from University Partners indicate that the educational partners liked the format and structure of the workshop, participated in the daily workshop activities, and most could see applications of the V&V instructional materials being used in their classrooms

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Imparting real world experiences is often a challenge due to both lack of effective active learning tools and delivery strategies This pedagogical requirement is important because graduates are expected to develop software that meets rigorous quality standards in functional and application domains with little to no training. As student learning retention and eventual application of the knowledge gained depends on knowledge retention activities delivered in different settings it is important to identify and incorporate delivery strategies that meet course and/or module learning outcomes and enhances student learning. Researchers in both academia and industry have published literature on delivery strategies. In addition student feedback and assessment are presented for each category of active learning tools and strategies that work are summarized

Active Learning Tools
Case Studies
Class Exercises
Case Study Videos
Dissemination
Delivery Strategies
Active Learning Tool Assessment
Institutional Profiles
Course Delivery
Delivery Strategies at RMU and UMD
Pedagogical Assessment
10. Conclusion and Recommendations
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call