Abstract
This paper presents an implementation of two 8-bit adders (HPA and CIA) and comparing their performance with respect to power delay product for different voltages in 90 nm regime. HPA is derived from Parallel prefix adders for minimized Power Delay product. CIA is derived from carry select adder with reduced area scheme for carry-select adders lowers this overhead by computing the carry and sum bits for a block-carry-in value of 0 only and by incrementing them afterwards depending on the final block-carry- in. For 8-bit implementation of carry generation, HPA needs 158 transistors where as CIA needs 282 transistors. HPA gives reduced power delay product compared to CIA. Tanner EDA tool is used for schematic implementation and simulating the adder designs in the 90nm technology
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
