Abstract
The dermatoglyphic study of these two cases revealed the presence of more arches and loops and less whorls in finger prints, and a very low ridge count. Loops and even whorls had a tendency for having very few ridges. The axial triradius was situated quite low, close to the carpal flexion creases, forming a low ‘aid’ angle. There wa no multiplication of axial triradii. There seems to be a common denominator for the dermatoglyphic findings in both these cases. However, it is not claimed that they alone can diagnose every case of Klinefelter’s syndrome. Further study is suggested.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
