Abstract

Biodiversity and species conservation are among the most urgent global issues. Both are under serious threat because of human intrusion and as a result, it is likely that present and future projects will affect threatened and endangered species. Thus, it is important to account for these impacts when evaluating and conducting cost and benefit analyses of projects. Due to their public good character and non-tradability, the total economic value of threatened and endangered species cannot be reflected by a market price and therefore, alternative approaches (stated preference method) are needed to determine their monetary value. This paper reviews and compares the valuation literature on threatened and endangered animals and conducts a meta-analysis regression to identify explanatory variables for the variation in willingness to pay for threatened and endangered species. The main findings of the meta-analysis show that the interaction of the level of threat and charisma have a positive effect on willingness to pay. Furthermore, developed countries have a higher willingness to pay compared to developing countries. Similarly, visitors of conservation sites have higher willingness to pay than residents. The provided example of a benefit transfer of the estimated function shows the practicability of our results.

Highlights

  • Species extinction and biodiversity loss are a worldwide concern as the global extinction rate increases for more and more species [1]

  • The purpose of this paper is to: (1) review and compare the valuation literature on threatened and endangered animals to provide an overview of past research activities in this field; (2) conduct a meta-analysis regression to identify variables which explain the variation in willingness to pay (WTP) for threatened and endangered species and (3) illustrate the application of meta-analysis regression functions for benefit transfer by exemplarily estimating the value of a bald eagle population

  • Limits which are common to all three response formats of contingent valuation method (CVM) include strategic bias, hypothetical bias, framing effects caused by the survey instrument and yes-saying which can lead to distorted estimates [27,28]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Species extinction and biodiversity loss are a worldwide concern as the global extinction rate increases for more and more species [1]. The purpose of this paper is to: (1) review and compare the valuation literature on threatened and endangered animals to provide an overview of past research activities in this field; (2) conduct a meta-analysis regression to identify variables which explain the variation in WTP for threatened and endangered species and (3) illustrate the application of meta-analysis regression functions for benefit transfer by exemplarily estimating the value of a bald eagle population. This analysis adds to the growing literature on non-market valuation on threatened and endangered species. This is followed by an example of a function benefit transfer and final remarks

Common Methods Used for the Valuation of Threatened and Endangered Species
Findings in the Literature on the Determinants of WTP
Literature Search and Study Collection
Methodology of Review
Categorisation of Species
Methodology of Meta-Analysis
Review of Valuation Studies
Meta-Analysis
Benefit Transfer Example for Threatened and Endangered Species
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.