Abstract
BackgroundThere is a consensus that exercise therapy should be used as a therapeutic approach in chronic low back pain (CLBP) but little consensus has been reached about the preferential type of therapy. Due to the heterogeneity of the population no clear effect of specific therapy interventions are found. Probably a specific subgroup of the investigated population will benefit from the intervention and another subgroup will not benefit, looking at the total investigated population no significant effects can be found. Therefore there is a need for the development of clinical prediction rules (CPRs). Objectives for this trial are first, the derivation of CPRs to predict treatment response to three forms of exercise therapy for patients with nonspecific CLBP. Secondly, we aim to validate a CPR for the three forms of exercise therapy for patients with nonspecific CLBP.Methods/DesignThe study design is a randomized controlled trial. Patients with nonspecific CLBP of more than three months duration are recruited at the Antwerp University Hospital (Belgium) and Apra Rehabilitation Hospital. After examination, patients are randomly assigned to one of three intervention groups: motor control therapy, general active exercise therapy and isometric training therapy. All patients will undergo 18 treatment sessions during nine weeks. Measurements will be taken at baseline, nine weeks, six months and at one year. The primary outcome used is the Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire score. For each type of exercise therapy a CPR will be derived and validated. For validation, the CPR will be applied to divide each treatment group into two subgroups (matched and unmatched therapy) using the baseline measurements. We predict a better therapeutic effect for matched therapy.DiscussionA randomized controlled trial has not previously been performed for the development of a CPR for exercise therapy in CLBP patients. Only one CPR was described in a single-arm design for motor control therapy in sub-acute non-radicular LBP patients. In this study, a sufficiently large sample will be included in both the derivation and validation phase.Trial registrationThis trial was registered with Clinicaltrials.gov on 10 February 2014, registration number: NCT02063503.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1745-6215-16-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
There is a consensus that exercise therapy should be used as a therapeutic approach in chronic low back pain (CLBP) but little consensus has been reached about the preferential type of therapy
One clinical prediction rules (CPR) was described in a single-arm design for motor control therapy in sub-acute non-radicular Low back pain (LBP) patients
There is a consensus that exercise therapy should be used as a therapeutic approach [2] but little consensus has been reached about the preferential type of therapy [3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14]
Summary
There is a consensus that exercise therapy should be used as a therapeutic approach in chronic low back pain (CLBP) but little consensus has been reached about the preferential type of therapy. There is a need for the development of clinical prediction rules (CPRs) Objectives for this trial are first, the derivation of CPRs to predict treatment response to three forms of exercise therapy for patients with nonspecific CLBP. About 5 to 10% of LBP patients develop chronic low back pain (CLBP), and 85% of these patients have nonspecific LBP [2]. The European guidelines [2] express the need for the development of tools which improve the classification and identification of specific clinical sub-groups of nonspecific CLBP patients
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have