Abstract

Tensegrity structures are pin-jointed assemblies of struts and cables that are held together in a stable state of stress. Shape control is a combination of control-commands with measurements to achieve a desired form. Applying shape control to a near-full-scale deployable tensegrity structure presents a rare opportunity to analytically and experimentally study and control the effects of large shape changes on a closely coupled multi-element system. Simulated cable-length changes provide an initial activation plan to reach an effective sequence for self-stress. Controlling internal forces is more sensitive than controlling movements through cable-length changes; internal force-control is thus a better objective than movement-control for small adjustments to the structure. The deployment of a tensegrity structure in previous work was carried out using predetermined commands. In this paper, two deployment methods and a method for self-stress are presented. The first method uses feedback cycles to increase speed of deployment compared with implementation of empirically predetermined control-commands. The second method consists of three parts starting with a path-planning algorithm that generates search trees at the initial point and the target point using a greedy algorithm to create a deployment trajectory. Collision and overstress avoidance for the deployment trajectory involve checks of boundaries defined by positions of struts and cables. Even actuator deployment followed by commands obtained from a search algorithm results in the successful connection of the structure at midspan. Once deployment at midspan is achieved by either method, a self-stress algorithm is implemented to correct the position and element forces in the structure to the design configuration prior to in-service loading. Modification of deployment control-commands using the feedback method (with twenty cycles) compared with empirically predetermined control-commands successfully provides a more efficient deployment trajectory prior to midspan connection with up to 50% reduction in deployment time. The path-planning method successfully enables deployment and connection at midspan with a further time reduction of 68% compared with the feedback method (with twenty cycles). The feedback control, the path-planning method and the soft-constraint algorithm successfully lead to efficient deployment and preparation for service loading. Advanced computing algorithms have potential to improve the efficiency of complex deployment.

Highlights

  • Many deployable structures today, such as retractable roofs (Gantes et al, 1989; Akgün et al, 2011) and spacecraft appendages (Pellegrino, 1995; Liu et al, 2014) deploy along one-degree of freedom

  • This paper describes a novel methodology for deployment of a near-full-scale pedestrian bridge

  • The number of control commands is shown on the horizontal axis and the average actuation cumulative cable-length change of continuous cables shown on the vertical axis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many deployable structures today, such as retractable roofs (Gantes et al, 1989; Akgün et al, 2011) and spacecraft appendages (Pellegrino, 1995; Liu et al, 2014) deploy along one-degree of freedom. Tensegrity structures are light-weight and deformable structures that are useful in applications such as flat roofs (Csölleová, 2012), floors (Fest et al, 2004; Motro et al, 2006), shells (Skelton et al, 2001), and towers (Schlaich, 2003). These structures are composed of bars in compression surrounded by a network of cables in tension to maintain stability (Pellegrino and Calladine, 1986; Motro, 2011; Snelson, 2012). In order to control the structure, either struts (Averseng and Dubé, 2012; Amendola et al, 2014) or cables (Sultan, 2014) have been actuated for shape control

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call