Abstract

BackgroundThe accuracy of estimated age should depend on the reference data sets (RDS) from which the maturity scores or Ages of Attainment (AoA) were obtained. This study aimed to test the accuracy of age estimation from three different population specific dental reference datasets (RDS).MethodsTwo hundred and sixty six dental panoramic radiographs of subjects belonging to southern Chinese ethnicity were scored and dental age (DA) was estimated from three reference datasets: French-Canadian, United Kingdom (UK) Caucasian and southern Chinese. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and for each method, the difference between the chronological age (CA) and dental age (CA-DA) was calculated using paired t-tests. In addition, Chi-square tests were performed to evaluate the accuracy of the age estimates within specific time interval from CA.ResultsThe estimated age difference (CA-DA) using the French Canadian RDS was − 0.62 years for males and − 0.36 years for females. For the UK Caucasian RDS, the age difference was 0.25 years for males and 0.23 years for females. The difference observed using the southern Chinese RDS was − 0.02 years for both genders and the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The southern Chinese RDS estimated the age of 80% of subjects within ±12 months range, and 90% of subjects within ±18 months range (p < 0.05) showing it to be more accurate than other datasets.ConclusionIt is concluded that population specific Reference Data Sets improve the accuracy of dental age estimation.

Highlights

  • The accuracy of estimated age should depend on the reference data sets (RDS) from which the maturity scores or Ages of Attainment (AoA) were obtained

  • A reference data was recently created based on the maturity of both maxillary and mandibular teeth in a cohort of Caucasian children living in the United Kingdom (UK)

  • The overall mean difference between the chronological age and dental age (CA-DA) calculated from Demirjian’s French-Canadian dataset was − 0.36 years for females and − 0.62 years for male; the difference was 0.23 years for females and 0.25 years for males when estimated from the UK Caucasian dataset

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The accuracy of estimated age should depend on the reference data sets (RDS) from which the maturity scores or Ages of Attainment (AoA) were obtained. The procedure for age assessment using radiographs involves two distinct phases; firstly, staging of the dental development, and secondly, retrieval of the scores or Ages of Attainment (AoA) for the corresponding stage of dental development from appropriate reference datasets. For this purpose, multiple methods for staging dental development have been proposed in the literature [5, 6]. A reference data was recently created based on the maturity of both maxillary and mandibular teeth in a cohort of Caucasian children living in the United Kingdom (UK) This method has superseded the Demirjian system and has been reported to be able to accurately estimate the age of Caucasian children [8]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call