Abstract

Dengue remains a major public threat and existing dengue control/surveillance programs lack sensitivity and proactivity. More efficient methods are needed. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted for 18 months to determine the efficacy of using a combination of gravid oviposition sticky (GOS) traps and dengue non-structural 1 (NS1) antigen for early surveillance of dengue among Aedes mosquito. Eight residential apartments were randomly assigned into intervention and control groups. GOS traps were placed at the intervention apartments weekly to trap Aedes mosquitoes and these tested for dengue NS1 antigen. When dengue-positive pool was detected, the community were notified and advised to execute protective measures. Fewer dengue cases were recorded in the intervention group than the control. Detection of NS1-positive mosquitoes was significantly associated with GOS Aedes index (rs = 0.68, P < 0.01) and occurrence of dengue cases (rs = 0.31, P < 0.01). Participants’ knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) toward dengue control indicated significant improvement for knowledge (P < 0.01), practice (P < 0.01) and total scores (P < 0.01). Most respondents thought this surveillance method is good (81.2%) and supported its use nationwide. Thus, GOS trap and dengue NS1 antigen test can supplement the current dengue surveillance/control, in alignment with the advocated integrated vector management for reducing Aedes-borne diseases.

Highlights

  • Dengue remains a major public threat and existing dengue control/surveillance programs lack sensitivity and proactivity

  • Throughout the 75 weeks of the trial period, 173 dengue cases and no deaths were reported in the intervention group

  • The change in dengue case ratio of the groups before and after gravid oviposition sticky (GOS) trap deployment compared to negative control that was not part of this surveillance study was investigated (Table 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Dengue remains a major public threat and existing dengue control/surveillance programs lack sensitivity and proactivity. This trial included the active monitoring of Aedes adult population using GOS trap, NS1 kit testing, active community engagement and participation in proactive vector control activities as well as both localized and targeted search and destroy.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call