Abstract

We showed that the Taylor Dispersion Analysis (TDA) is a fast and easy to use method for the study of denaturation proteins. We applied TDA to study denaturation of β-lactoglobulin, transferrin, and human insulin by anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). A series of measurements at constant protein concentration (for transferrin was 1.9 x 10−5 M, for β- lactoglobulin was 7.6 x 10−5 M, and for insulin was 1.2 x 10−4 M) and varying SDS concentrations were carried out in the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The structural changes were analyzed based on the diffusion coefficients of the complexes formed at various surfactant concentrations. The concentration of surfactant was varied in the range from 1.2 x 10−4 M to 8.7 x 10−2 M. We determined the minimum concentration of the surfactant necessary to change the native conformation of the proteins. The minimal concentration of SDS for β-lactoglobulin and transferrin was 4.3 x 10−4 M and for insulin 2.3 x 10−4 M. To evaluate the TDA as a novel method for studying denaturation of proteins we also applied other methods i.e. electronic circular dichroism (ECD) and dynamic light scattering (DLS) to study the same phenomenon. The results obtained using these methods were in agreement with the results from TDA.

Highlights

  • Proteins and surfactants are commonly used in the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetics industries [1,2]

  • We show that the Taylor dispersion analysis [25,26,27,28,29,30], a simple method applicable at chromatographic equipment, can be used for rapid determination of denaturation of proteins

  • According to the Stokes—Sutherland—Einstein equation an increase in the size of the object leads to a decrease of its diffusion coefficient

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Proteins and surfactants are commonly used in the pharmaceutical, food, and cosmetics industries [1,2]. The addition of surfactants to protein solutions changes the physical properties of the protein i.e. unfolds proteins and causes aggregation and adsorption of proteins to surfaces [9,10]. Both the structural stability of the protein and the molecular structure of the surfactant (charge, length, shape of the polar and apolar part of the surfactant) has an impact on their mutual binding affinity. The nature of the interactions of proteins with ionic surfactants is both electrostatic and hydrophobic. The strength of interactions depends on the net charge of protein and surfactant.

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.