Abstract
The LAL test has been the "gold standard" for endotoxin testing ever since it was first published as USP Chapter <85> in 1980. Since then, a number of innovative methods have been proposed to augment or replace the LAL test. However novel an alternate test method might be, we must be cognizant of our obligation to patient safety and heed compendial and compliance requirements to demonstrate results equivalence between any candidate (alternate) method and a predicate (compendial) test method. The following discussion explores the concepts of "equivalent", "different" and "not different", proposes the use of a two one sided test (TOST) for the demonstration of equivalence and provides examples of calculations using commercially available software to assess data on alternative endotoxins detection methods that have been published in the public domain1.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: PDA journal of pharmaceutical science and technology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
