Abstract

Urban areas exist in a wide variety of population sizes, from small towns to huge megaci- ties. The statistics of city size distributions have been under scrutiny for over a century. No proposed form has received more attention than Zipf’s law, a Pareto distribution with power value one. Data from many urban systems approximately support Zipf’s distribution while typically also violating its expectations for small and large cities and showing variations in ex- ponents. No theory presently exists to derive city size distributions from demographic choices while also explaining consistent variations. Here we show how the structure of migration flows between cities together with the differential magnitude of their vital rates determine a variety of size distributions. These results provide a powerful framework for deriving Zipf’s law and other size distributions under specific additional conditions, and to resolve puzzles associated with their deviations in terms of concepts of symmetry, information, and selection.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call