Demographic, Clinical Profile of Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients and Their Association with Disease Severity in Ghana.

To compare Doppler ultrasound (US) and 3.0-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (3.0-T MRI) findings of synovial inflammation in the tendons and joints in an early polyarthritis cohort (patients who presented < 1 year after arthritis onset) using a bilateral hand and wrist evaluation. Also, to evaluate the diagnostic performance of US and MRI findings for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), their ability to predict RA as a diagnostic outcome, and their capacity to improve the accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) RA classification criteria in early arthritis. Forty-five patients (40 women, 5 men; mean age 45.6 yrs) with untreated recent-onset polyarthritis participated in this prospective study and were examined using an US and MRI approach including both wrists and hands. After a followup of 12 months, patients were classified as having RA if they fulfilled the criteria for RA. The proportion of synovitis identified by US and MRI for each joint and tendon region was compared by chi-square test. The diagnostic performance of US and MRI for RA identification was evaluated using receiver-operating curve (ROC) analysis. Possible associations between synovitis for each joint and tendon region as identified by US or MRI and RA diagnosis at 12 months were tested by logistic regression analysis. The diagnostic performance of the ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria corrected by US and MRI joint and tendon counts was evaluated using ROC analysis. Thirty patients fulfilled the ACR/EULAR criteria [early RA (ERA) patients] and the remaining 15 failed to meet these criteria (non-RA). Carpal joint synovitis and tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons was found in 86.7% and 86.7% of patients with ERA on MRI compared with 63.3% and 50% on US, respectively (p < 0.05). The global MRI and US counts revealed a good diagnostic performance for RA diagnosis of both techniques, although MRI was statistically significantly better [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.959 and AUC = 0.853, respectively; z statistic = 2.210, p < 0.05]. MRI identification of carpal joint synovitis (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.119-11.841), tenosynovitis of the flexor tendons (OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.620-16.051), and global joint and tendon count (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.249-6.139) were in the multivariate logistic regression model the most powerful predictors of progression toward RA. In the group of ERA patients with US joint and tendon counts ≤ 10, a statistically significant difference was found between the diagnostic performance for RA of the ACR/EULAR criteria as previously described and the diagnostic performance of the MRI-corrected ACR/EULAR criteria (AUC = 0.898 and AUC = 0.986, respectively; z statistic = 2.181, p < 0.05). 3.0-T MRI identified a higher prevalence of synovitis in comparison to US in an early polyarthritis cohort. Both techniques have good diagnostic performance for RA although MRI reveals a significantly higher diagnostic capability. Synovitis of carpal joints and of flexor tendons as identified by MRI were the most powerful predictors of progression toward RA. In patients with US joint and tendon counts ≤ 10, MRI can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria.

New American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have recently been proposed. The aim of this cohort study was to examine whether fulfilling these 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria at the first visit has an impact on the clinical course and on the radiographic progression of the disease. For this observational cohort study, we included patients from the Swiss RA registry SCQM with early RA or undifferentiated arthritis (UA, disease duration ≤1year), as defined by the treating rheumatologist, who had not received any previous disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Patients were categorized into two groups depending on whether or not they fulfilled the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (≥6 points vs <6 points) at the first visit. The primary outcome measures were the evolution of the DAS 28 and of radiographic erosions as measured by the Ratingen score over time. Of the 592 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria, 352 satisfied the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria at baseline, whereas 240 were not classifiable as definite RA. The ACR/EULAR criteria scores correlated with disease activity at disease onset (R (2) = 0.31). DMARD treatment was subsequently initiated in all patients, mostly with methotrexate (MTX). There were no significant differences in the therapeutic strategies between patients fulfilling or not fulfilling the classification criteria. Six months after inclusion, patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR criteria developed a 39.1% reduction of DAS 28 scores, as compared to a 33.6% reduction in patients not fulfilling the ACR/EULAR criteria (p = 0.0002), independently of their respective treatment strategy. Importantly, the DAS 28 scores were higher in those patients fulfilling the ACR/EULAR criteria (ACR/EULAR positive patients) throughout the observation, as compared to patients not fulfilling those (ACR/EULAR negative patients). Average radiographic progression was higher among ACR/EULAR positive than negative patients (progression of Ratingen score/year 0.50 vs 0.32, resp., p = 0.03) after 3years of follow-up. Among early RA/UA patients, a score of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria sufficient to classify RA selects patients with worse clinical outcome and more radiographic progression.

Objective To evaluate the value of 2012 classification criteria for early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria, and 1987 ACR classification criteria in the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods Patients who had at least one swollen and tender joint with disease duration no more than 2 years, and age more than 16 years were enrolled. The patients were diagnosed as RA or other non-RA by 2 exper-ienced rheumatologists. The clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. The sensitivity and specificity of three RA classification criteria were compared by McNemar test, The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) curve (AUC) of each RA classification criteria were analyzed using MedCalc software. Results A total of 310 patients were enrolled in this study, including 182 ERA and 128 non-RA. The sensitivity(88.5%) of ERA criteria was much higher than that of the 1987 ACR criteria (45.6%, χ2=75.013, P 0.05). The specificity of ERA criteria (91.4%) of 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria (87.5%, χ2=1.8, P>0.05) was similar to that of the 1987 ACR criteria (96.1%, χ2=3.1, P>0.05). The AUC of ERA criteria was 0.962 [95%CI(0.934, 0.980)], which was slightly better than that of the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria 0.959 [95%CI(0.931, 0.978)], Z=0.380, P=0.7038, and much higher than that of the 1987 ACR criteria 0.885 [95%CI (0.845, 0.919)], Z=4.517, P<0.01. Conclusion Overall evaluation, the diagnostic value of ERA criteria is better than 1987 ACR and 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria in early rheumatoid arthritis. Compared to 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, ERA criteria is more simple and practical. Key words: Arthritis, rheumatoid; Diagnosis; Reference standards

ObjectivesThe aims of this study were to suggest patient-adjusted optical spectral transmission (OST) cut-off values for the first time and to develop clinical models that predict the probability of an early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) diagnosis based on OST findings and the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria as a reference standard.MethodsOST examinations were performed in newly diagnosed RA patients and healthy controls by the HandScan device. Moreover, RA patients underwent a full clinical [tender/swollen joint counts (TJC/SJC), disease activity score-28 (DAS28)] and laboratory evaluation. OST confounding factors were examined via logistic multivariate regression analyses and patient-adjusted OST-cut-offs were subsequently determined. Furthermore, statistical models to calculate the probability of an RA diagnosis, based on the measured OST values and the presence of OST influencing factors, were developed. Finally, correlations of OST with RA activity parameters were assessed.Results1.584 joints of 72 early RA patients were examined via OST and compared to 2.200 joints of 100 healthy controls and 1.166 joints of 53 patients with non-inflammatory arthralgia (NIA), respectively. Overall OST diagnostic performance was excellent in the whole cohort between RA- and healthy control-group [Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC): 0.810 (95%CI: 0.746–0.873); p < 0.0001], and further improved in RA-patients with ≥ 1 swollen wrist/finger joint(s) [AUC: 0.841 (95%CI: 0.773–0.908); p < 0.0001]. Comparison between RA patients and patients with non-inflammatory arthralgia showed similar results by an AUC of 0.788 (95%-CI: 0.709–0.867; p < 0.0001), and further improved in RA patients with ≥ 1 swollen wrist/finger joint(s) [AUC: 0.822 (95%CI: 0.74–0.90); p < 0.0001]. For the assessment of an adjusted RA diagnosis probability, two gender-specific statistical models were developed, based on OST values and patient age. OST cut-off values of 11.2 and 18.21 were calculated for female and male patients with active disease (sensitivity 93% and 67%; specificity 71.2% and 90%), respectively. Among RA patients, OST was associated moderately/significantly with DAS28 (r = 0.42,p < 0.001) and swollen joint count (rho = 0.355,p = 0.002).ConclusionThe development of patient-adjusted OST cut-off values and the suggested statistical models significantly enhance OST’s diagnostic performance, supporting its utility in differentiating between RA and non-inflammatory conditions. Future research should include a broader spectrum of arthritis types to validate OST’s comprehensive diagnostic utility also across various inflammatory arthritides.Trial registrationDRKS00016752 (German Registry of Clinical Trials)

To identify bilateral hand and wrist findings of synovial inflammation associated with progression to rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in very-early-RA cohort (VERA) (duration, <3 months) and early-RA cohort (ERA) (duration, <12 but >3 months), to test tenosynovitis as a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging additional parameter for improving diagnostic accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) RA classification criteria, and to evaluate the symmetry of joint and tendon involvement. With institutional review board approval and informed consent, 32 women and three men (mean age, 45 years) with untreated recent-onset inflammatory arthritis participated in this prospective study and underwent MR imaging of both wrists and hands. After 12-month follow-up, 25 patients fulfilled the criteria for RA (10 VERA and 15 ERA patients). Ten patients did not fulfill the criteria for RA (non-RA [control] group). Possible associations between synovitis for each joint and tendon and RA diagnosis at 12 months were tested (univariate logistic regression analysis). Diagnostic performance of the ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria was evaluated (receiver operating characteristic curve analysis). Asymmetry prevalence (all joints and tendons in the analysis) was calculated. Tenosynovitis of the extensor carpi ulnaris (odds ratio, 3.21) and flexor tendons of the second finger (odds ratio, 14.61) in VERA group and synovitis of the radioulnar joint (odds ratio, 8.79) and tenosynovitis of flexor tendons of the second finger (odds ratio, 9.60) in ERA group were significantly associated with progression to RA (P < .05). Consideration of tenosynovitis improved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of ACR/EULAR criteria performance for the diagnosis of RA from 0.942 (P < .0001; sensitivity, 52%; specificity, 100%) to 0.972 (P < .0001; sensitivity, 76%; specificity, 100%), with cutoff score of 6 or greater. Asymmetry was found in 80.0% (62 of 77) (VERA patients) and 69.3% (106 of 153) (ERA patients) of joint or tendon pairs (P < .05). Tenosynovitis is an imaging finding in early RA, and its inclusion as a scoring criterion might contribute for a better diagnostic performance of the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification; early RA is an asymmetric disease.

Objective. To determine the degree of contribution and the contributing factors of ultrasound in the diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in daily clinical practice and the predictive differences depending on seropositivity.Methods. We included 122 patients who presented with the main complaint of finger and/or wrist joint pain but for whom no definite diagnosis was reached or treatment strategy was provided. Ultrasound was performed on at least 22 joints (both wrist joints, proximal interphalangeal joint, and metacarpophalangeal joints), and patients were followed for ≥6 months. Factors contributing to RA diagnosis were determined and compared between seropositive and seronegative RA patients.Results. RA was diagnosed in 52 of 122 patients, in whom the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria (odds ratio [OR] = 4.74, P = 0.01) and gray scale (GS) grade of 3 (OR = 3.64, P = 0.04) for ≥ 1 joint were the contributing factors. In seropositive RA, the ACR/EULAR criteria (OR = 15.53, P < 0.001) and power Doppler (PD) ≥ 2 for ≥ 1 joint (OR = 10.48, P = 0.0048) were the contributing factors. In seronegative RA, PD ≥ 1 for ≥ 1 joint contributed the most (OR = 20.00, P = 0.0044), but the ACR/EULAR criteria did not contribute to RA diagnosis (P = 0.57).Conclusion. Ultrasound findings contributed to RA diagnosis in clinical practice. The contributing factors are different in the presence or absence of seropositivity, and ultrasound complementation was particularly useful in seronegative RA patients.

FRI0551 PERFORMANCE OF THE 2019 AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RHEUMATOLOGY/EUROPEAN LEAGUE AGAINST RHEUMATISM SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA

Does ACR/EULAR remission mean improved functional ability, quality of life and work productivity?

This study assessed an association of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (ACPA) with clinical and radiological disease severity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Fifty patients diagnosed with RA as per 2010 revised American College of Rheumatology/ European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria were included in this cross-sectional study. Serum levels of ACPA, C-reactive protein (CRP) and rheumatoid factor (RF), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), disease activity score with 28-joint counts and ESR (DAS28-ESR), patient's global assessment of disease activity using visual analogue scale (PtGA-VAS), modified health assessment questionnaire score (M-HAQ) and radiological damage in hands and feet (modified Larsen score) were determined. ACPA were positive in 48 (96%) and RF in 44 (88%) patients. Mean Larsen score was 19.82 ± 17.11 and mean DAS28-ESR 6.39 ± 1.59. A significant correlation of ACPA levels was seen with RF (p=0.03) and Larsen score (p=0.02) but not with DAS28-ESR (p=0.17) and M-HAQ (p=0.81). A significant correlation was seen between Larsen score and disease duration (p<0.0001), age (p=0.04), DAS28-ESR (p=0.001) and M-HAQ (p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that painful joint count (p=0.003), ESR (p<0.001) and PtGA-VAS (p=0.009) were independently associated with clinical disease activity severity. Disease duration (p=0.01), ACPA levels (p=0.004) and DAS28-ESR (p=0.03) were independently associated with radiological joint damage. Serum ACPA levels correlate significantly with radiological severity of RA but not with clinical disease severity and are independently associated with radiological outcome.

Background:Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease that is characterized by local and general bone loss. Osteoporosis (OP) is one of the most frequent comorbidities associated with RA. Many...

Objectives. To determine the prevalence and distribution of signs of synovitis in the residual joints in remission defined by the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission criteria and the role of their components in preventing misclassification due to reduced joint count.Methods. The cross-sectional observational data of RA patients including full joint counts were analyzed. Definitions of remission used were the ACR/EULAR RA remission criteria and their modifications using full joint counts with the same thresholds of the items and the calculated results.Results. A total of 304 RA patients with 3,149 observations could be analyzed. Patients in remission according to the ACR/EULAR remission criteria can still show residual disease activity in the feet in up to 27% of the population with a 28-joint count remission. Residual disease activity has no impact on patient's global assessment for current disease activity, when signs of concomitant ankle joint synovitis were absent.Conclusions. RA patients in remission according to the ACR/EULAR definitions can still show signs of synovitis mostly in the forefeet joints. Acute-phase reactants and patient's global assessment for current disease activity have little impact in mitigating the limitation of reduced joint count.

THU0180 Should we include ultrasound in the 1987 acr and 2010 acr/eular classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis?

Nowadays, rheumatologists face challenges in finding an effective method to classify and treat patients with undifferentiated arthritis (UA). There is a need for new tools that could ensure accurate characterization of inflammatory processes in these patients. The aim of this study was to investigate if a characterization of UA patients using ultrasound (US) may help to fulfill the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria in a real-life cohort. We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2 rheumatology care clinics. Patients not fulfilling the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA criteria were included. On the examination day, all patients underwent a physical examination, radiography, and US. The 7-joint US score was adopted to scan all patients. The US was performed according to EULAR criteria and interpreted by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology definitions. Gray-scale and power Doppler synovitis and tenosynovitis were scored. Bone erosions were also evaluated during the US examination. A total of 204 patients were included. The diagnosis was modified from UA to RA in 86 patients (42.1%). Also, the final score of the 2010 ACR/EULAR RA classification criteria changed from a mean of 4.6 to 6.5 after the US examination. In addition to synovitis, a wide range of tenosynovitis and bone erosions were detected by US. Synovitis was more frequently detected in second metacarpophalangeal joint followed by second metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPj) and fifth MTPj. The tendons of the wrist and second and third fingers were the most affected. In relation to bone erosions, second metacarpophalangeal joint and fifth MTPj were the joints with more proportion of anatomical damage. The US demonstrated to be useful to help accurately classify as RA patients previously diagnosed with UA.

To investigate what factors influence patient global health assessment (PtGlobal), and how those factors and the reliability of PtGlobal affect the rate, reliability, and validity of recently published American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission criteria when used in clinical practice. We examined consecutive patients with RA in clinical practice and identified 77 who met ACR/EULAR joint criteria for remission (≤ 1 swollen joint and ≤ 1 tender joint). We evaluated factors associated with a PtGlobal > 1, because a PtGlobal ≤ 1 defined ACR/EULAR remission in this group of patients who had already met ACR/EULAR joint criteria. Of the 77 patients examined, only 17 (22.1%) had PtGlobal ≤ 1 and thus fully satisfied ACR/EULAR criteria. A large proportion of patients not in remission by ACR/EULAR criteria had high PtGlobal related to noninflammatory issues, including low back pain, fatigue, and functional limitations, and a number of patients clustered in the range of PtGlobal > 1 and ≤ 2. However, the minimal detectable difference for PtGlobal was 2.3. In addition, compared with a PtGlobal severity score, a PtGlobal activity score was 3.3% less likely to be abnormal (> 1). Noninflammatory factors contribute to the level of PtGlobal and result in the exclusion of many patients who would otherwise be in "true" remission according to the ACR/EULAR definition. Reliability problems associated with PtGlobal can also result in misclassification, and may explain the observation of low longterm remission rates in RA. As currently constituted, the use of the ACR/EULAR remission criteria in clinical practice appears to be problematic.

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) and 1987 ACR criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the respective role of the algorithm and scoring of the ACR/EULAR. In total, 270 patients with recent-onset arthritis of < 1 year duration were included prospectively between 1995 and 1997 and followed for 2 years. RA was defined as the combination, at completion of followup, of RA diagnosed by an office-based rheumatologist and treatment with a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or glucocorticoid. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the criteria sets in the overall population, in the subgroup meeting the tree condition for ACR/EULAR scoring, and in the overall population classified according the full tree. At baseline, 111 of the 270 patients had better alternative diagnoses and 16 had erosions typical for RA; of the 143 remaining patients, 52 had more than 6 ACR/EULAR 2010 points (indicating definite RA) and 91 had fewer than 6 points. After 2 years, 11/16 patients with erosions and 40/52 with more than 6 points had RA. 100 of the 270 patients met the reference standard for RA. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the ACR/EULAR (full tree) were 51/100 (51%), 153/170 (90%), 51/68 (75.4%), and 153/202 (75.7%), respectively. Diagnostic accuracies of the ACR/EULAR score and ACR 1987 criteria were not statistically different. Much of the improvement of the ACR/EULAR criteria was ascribable to the use of exclusion criteria in the algorithm.