Abstract

Although classical theorists tend to believe that immigrant youth are more delinquent than native-born adolescents, the existing empirical studies have shown the opposite. The current paper first gives a comprehensive overview of major theoretical explanations for the relatively lower level of delinquency among immigrant youth, including cultural perspectives, strain theories, social control theory, social learning theory, and social disorganization theory. The main argument is that immigrant youth who have not yet acculturated to the youth subculture of the host society are more law-abiding due to protections from their traditional traits (i.e., being more realistic, stronger ties with family/schools, less access to delinquent friends, and higher level of collective efficacy in homogeneous neighborhoods). All these theories are also applied to explain the generational differences in terms of delinquency: compared to earlier generations, later generations of immigrant youth are often more delinquent because they are more acculturated and the protective factors from their origins wear off over time. The continuing public and political bias toward immigrant youth has been explained by social constructionists. We further discuss the necessity of a synthesis of these theoretical approaches and the importance to examine both internal and international migration under similar theoretical frameworks in the modern era.

Highlights

  • The relationship between immigration and crime has long been a controversial issue in public debate and academic research

  • The other key way pertains to the conditioning mechanism: migrant youth are especially prone to cope with strain and subsequent negative affects through crime and delinquency, as they are deprived of the social support resources needed for strain moderation through legitimate means

  • What is the difference between these youth and their local counterparts? Why are they different? Mainstream criminological theories further explained that compared with native-born peers, immigrant youth encounter less strain by holding realistic expectations in a material world, maintain stronger ties with families and schools, have less opportunities to interact with delinquent friends due to traditional family constraints, and enjoy more collective efficacy in their homogeneous neighborhoods

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The relationship between immigration and crime has long been a controversial issue in public debate and academic research. We first review six broad strands of sociological and criminological theoretical development on the immigration-crime relationship and the possible generational differences: cultural, strain, social learning, social control, social disorganization, and social constructionism. These theories contribute significantly to our understanding of immigrant-related delinquency and crime in developed societies such as the United States (U.S.) and European countries, but significant room remains for theoretical revision, elaboration, and innovation. After introducing the theoretical origin and recent development of each theory, we discuss the current research gaps and possible theoretical extensions to address the complexities of the immigration-crime field, based on relevant empirical findings

Main Theoretical Arguments
Empirical Evidence and Research Gaps
General Immigration-Delinquency Relationship
Generational Differences of Delinquency among Immigrant Youth
Implications for Studies of Internal Migration and Delinquency
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call