Abstract
This article proposes a review of the Colombian Constitutional Court jurisprudence regarding theadmissibility of the “tutela action” against arbitral awards. Firstly, it reviews the jurisprudence thatdeveloped the doctrine of the “vía de hecho” and the tutela against judicial sentences. Secondly,it analyzes the extension of the doctrine of tutela against sentences to domestic awards. Finally, itexamines the SU-500/15 and T-354/19 judgments that set a precedent in the Colombian constitutionaljurisprudence by allowing the admissibility of the tutela action against international awards seated in Colombia, which generates the need to establish different rules when it comes to national and international awards and the implications in terms of subsidiarity in relation to the action to set aside arbitral awards.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
